Proposal for collaborative maintenance of this project

[jcfr]

@swinton Thanks for putting together this streamlined GitHub Action 🙏 💯

Would you consider adding other maintainers to help integrate outstanding pull requests and performing general maintenance ?

In the meantime, you will find the following pull requests:

• Add Dependabot workflow to update GitHub Actions #35
• Update npm dependencies #36

[jcfr]

There are other pull requests (that are currently only made in my fork) that would gladly contribute upstream here:

• Tweak GitHub action workflow lifecycle jcfr/screenshot-website#3
• dependabot: Enable npm package updates jcfr/screenshot-website#4

As well as these updates done automatically thanks to @dependabot:

• Bump actions/checkout from 2.7.0 to 3.5.2 jcfr/screenshot-website#5
• Bump eslint-config-airbnb from 18.0.1 to 19.0.4 jcfr/screenshot-website#6
• Bump husky from 4.3.8 to 8.0.3 jcfr/screenshot-website#8
• Bump puppeteer from 2.1.1 to 20.2.1 jcfr/screenshot-website#7
• Bump bunyan from 1.8.12 to 1.8.15 jcfr/screenshot-website#9
• Bump eslint-config-prettier from 6.10.0 to 6.15.0 jcfr/screenshot-website#10

[spier]

I see a couple of warnings in my GitHub Actions workflow that I think stem from the swinton/[email protected] GHA:

The following actions uses node12 which is deprecated and will be forced to run on node16: swinton/[email protected]. For more info: https://github.blog/changelog/2023-06-13-github-actions-all-actions-will-run-on-node16-instead-of-node12-by-default/Show

The set-output command is deprecated and will be disabled soon. Please upgrade to using Environment Files. For more information see: https://github.blog/changelog/2022-10-11-github-actions-deprecating-save-state-and-set-output-commands/

@jcfr I saw that you started this thread some months back. Did you have any luck reaching @swinton?

Would be great if we could collaborate here to get this GHA back into a state where we can all continue to uses it. And yes, that means that I am offering my help as well :)

[jcfr]

Did you have any luck reaching @swinton?

I haven't received a response so far.

And yes, that means that I am offering my help as well :)

That is great. Thanks for offering to help.

back into a state where we can all continue to uses it.

I completely agree. It's essential to find a solution that ensures ongoing collaboration and maintenance.

I am thinking of a few options:

(1) https://github.com/jcfr

We could consider using my personal fork of the project as its new home.

(2) https://github.com/Slicer

Since we are currently using this action in the context of continuous integration for the slicer.org website¹², we might want to create a fork within the Slicer organization.

I'll make sure to discuss this with the community before making any decisions, but I don't anticipate any issues.

Other GitHub user or organization ?

If you have any other suggestions for a more suitable home, please feel free to share.

Footnotes

1. https://github.com/Slicer/slicer.org/tree/main/.github/actions/screenshot-website-imgur-upload ↩

2. https://github.com/Slicer/slicer.org/blob/main/.github/workflows/build-website.yml ↩

[spier]

I don't have a strict preference.

Of course it would be best if we could keep it where it is (i.e. at https://github.com/swinton/screenshot-website) as that might allow us to make the fixes without breaking existing workflows of other users.

However I agree that currently it looks like that might not be possible.

In that case, we could start at https://github.com/jcfr and make all fixes that we need to make. Once we got things working, we can still to move the project into the https://github.com/Slicer org, if you want.

We probably don't have to think about the "where should it live" decision that much right now, as I assume that your fork at https://github.com/jcfr/screenshot-website doesn't have that many users right now, does it? :) i.e. we could move it later without much disruption?

[swinton]

Would you consider adding other maintainers to help integrate outstanding pull requests and performing general maintenance ?

Yes, definitely. Thank you for the proposal and apologies for my delay in responding.

@jcfr I've invited you to the repo, so you should have push access.

Happy to also discuss a more suitable long-term plan, perhaps under a dedicated org. Feel free to email me directly as well, stevewinton[at]gmail 🙏

[jcfr]

To follow-up on this, @swinton invited me to collaborate 🙏 , waiting we settle on a more suitable long-term plan, this should allow to move forward 🚀

[spier]

Very awesome to hear!

[jcfr]

Update

The set-output command is deprecated and will be disabled soon.

For future reference, this has been addressed in the following pull request:

• Bump @actions/core from 1.2.3 to 1.10.0 #64

Next

Release of v1.1.0 along with update of branch v1.x will happen soon.

[spier]

@jcfr that's great.

I tested this in my workflow directly from /screenshot-website@main.
Can confirm that this made the set-output warning disappear :)

[jcfr]

Can confirm that this made the set-output warning disappear :)

Thanks for confirming it works on your side 💯

[spier]

@jcfr are you still planning to cut the v1.1.0 release, or did you run out of time? :) I totally understand in any case, this happens!