You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks a lot for your great repo.
According to FaceNet paper the best dimension for embedded vector is 128. I am curious to know is there any specific reason that you used four time bigger embedded vector dimension to 512?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you for your kind words. There is no concrete reason, I was trying with size 128, 256, and 512 and have found that size 512 yielded the best performance in the training experiments but not much at all. Keeping the size as the FaceNet paper would be fine.
Hi @tamerthamoqa ,
Thanks a lot for your great repo.
According to FaceNet paper the best dimension for embedded vector is 128. I am curious to know is there any specific reason that you used four time bigger embedded vector dimension to 512?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: