-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Maintenance Status #2
Comments
Your issue seems quite hostile. Is it common to threaten crates with RUSTSEC issues? Does RUSTSEC know of its weaponization? |
Sorry @tbu- , I didn't mean for it to come across that way. But this isn't an uncommon use of RUSTSEC; that's why they have a whole category for "unmaintained". BTW, do you intend to pick this crate up again? |
I do intend to fix issues if they're reported. A crate not needing updates is a good thing, not a bad one.
I assume that causes some problem for you? Can you describe why it's bad for you that it does that?
Yea, that's bad. Fixed it yesterday.
Those are just dev-dependencies and shouldn't impact users of the crate. It's still annoying for developers, so should get fixed. |
It means that downstream projects which already depend on one or both of those crates may end up building two versions, increasing build times and binary sizes. |
I removed the |
This crate hasn't been touched for 8 years, and there are a few obvious problems:
num
relies on unstable library features and will stop compiling with future toolchains. See Tracking issue for future-incompatibility lintsoft_unstable
rust-lang/rust#64266 .Does the author ever intend to fix these problems? If not, I suggest it's time to file a RUSTSEC issue for an abandoned crate and fork this one.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: