Do dotted intrinsics count as well‑known intrinsic objects?

[ExE-Boss]

I’m opening this issue because of this discussion I had with @ljharb in #2056 (comment):

---

Originally posted by @ljharb in #2056 (comment)

this PR is purely editorial (no observable change) except for an impact on Function.prototype.toString (which makes this PR accidentally normative, which means it won't land soon).

---

Originally posted by @ExE-Boss in #2056 (comment)

Well, the impact on Function.prototype.toString won’t be observable, as engines already include PropertyName when stringifing all named built‑in functions.

Also, I’m pretty sure that dotted intrinsics also count as well‑known intrinsic objects.

---

Originally posted by @ljharb in #2056 (comment)

@ExE-Boss as is, the PR is normative in the sense that it allows engines to omit more names. Another option is to tighten the toString requirement to require all names.

"well-known" means it's in the table; I don't think dotted forms are in that category - and if they were, then the change to support the dotted notation was normative, because it then imposes the toString name requirement on every function.

[devsnek]

The Function.prototype.toString issue is fixed by #1948