Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 25, 2022. It is now read-only.

Shorter way to trigger indirect eval πŸŽ‰ #21

Closed
claudepache opened this issue Jul 26, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Shorter way to trigger indirect eval πŸŽ‰ #21

claudepache opened this issue Jul 26, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@claudepache
Copy link
Collaborator

With this proposal we have a new, shiny way to trigger indirect eval:

eval?.(foo)

This is a two-char gain over the traditional (0,eval)(foo) β€” a good occasion to make the spec logo even greater (by at least 2px).

@claudepache
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Depending on how #5 is resolved, we may end up with only a one-char gain. :-(

However, it is certain that we’ll have some gain anyway. Thus, this issue may be closed as positively resolved anyway.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant