Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No event for PipelineValidationFailed #1201

Closed
Letty5411 opened this issue Aug 16, 2019 · 12 comments
Closed

No event for PipelineValidationFailed #1201

Letty5411 opened this issue Aug 16, 2019 · 12 comments
Assignees
Labels
kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.

Comments

@Letty5411
Copy link
Contributor

Expected Behavior

When try to run a pipelinerun, it failed with the following condition:

status:
  completionTime: 2019-08-16T06:07:38Z
  conditions:
  - lastTransitionTime: 2019-08-16T06:07:38Z
    message: 'invalid input params: missing values for these params which have no
      default values: [TESTCASE]'
    reason: PipelineValidationFailed
    status: "False"
    type: Succeeded
  startTime: 2019-08-16T06:07:38Z

In this situation, I expect that there may be event about this failure.

Actual Behavior

No event in this situation.

Steps to Reproduce the Problem

Additional Info

@dibyom dibyom added good first issue Denotes an issue ready for a new contributor, according to the "help wanted" guidelines. help wanted Denotes an issue that needs help from a contributor. Must meet "help wanted" guidelines. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. labels Dec 3, 2019
@NikeNano
Copy link

NikeNano commented Apr 8, 2020

I would be happy to help out with this one @dibyom. Can I start to work on it?

@vdemeester
Copy link
Member

@NikeNano I think this is gonna be fixed by #2082 (cc @afrittoli )

@afrittoli
Copy link
Member

@Letty5411 thanks for reporting this and @NikeNano thanks for contributing!
There is definitely an inconsistency in how we generate emit events today, I tried to capture the complete (!) matrix in #2329

So indeed I was going to address this as part of #2082 / #2039.

@NikeNano
Copy link

NikeNano commented Apr 8, 2020

@Letty5411 thanks for reporting this and @NikeNano thanks for contributing!
There is definitely an inconsistency in how we generate emit events today, I tried to capture the complete (!) matrix in #2329

So indeed I was going to address this as part of #2082 / #2039.

Ok, cool. Then I see if I can find some other issues to look at :)

@bobcatfish
Copy link
Collaborator

@afrittoli are you tackling both k8s events and cloudevents in your work?

@afrittoli
Copy link
Member

@afrittoli are you tackling both k8s events and cloudevents in your work?

Yes, I am - first PR fixes k8s events, second PR will add cloudevents

@vdemeester
Copy link
Member

@afrittoli is this fixed ? 🙃

@bobcatfish bobcatfish removed good first issue Denotes an issue ready for a new contributor, according to the "help wanted" guidelines. help wanted Denotes an issue that needs help from a contributor. Must meet "help wanted" guidelines. labels Sep 1, 2020
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

Send feedback to tektoncd/plumbing.

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Nov 30, 2020
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten with a justification.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.
If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close with a justification.
If this issue should be exempted, mark the issue as frozen with /lifecycle frozen with a justification.

/lifecycle rotten

Send feedback to tektoncd/plumbing.

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Dec 30, 2020
@vdemeester
Copy link
Member

Is this still the case ? (cc @afrittoli)

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen with a justification.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten with a justification.
If this issue should be exempted, mark the issue as frozen with /lifecycle frozen with a justification.

/close

Send feedback to tektoncd/plumbing.

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@tekton-robot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen with a justification.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten with a justification.
If this issue should be exempted, mark the issue as frozen with /lifecycle frozen with a justification.

/close

Send feedback to tektoncd/plumbing.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants