Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use tekton instead of all as categories 🎿 #1884

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 17, 2020

Conversation

vdemeester
Copy link
Member

Changes

This means Tekton struct won't show in kubectl get all but in
kubectl get tekton (or kubectl get tekton-pipelines) 😉.

If we do this for other tektoncd project (like tektoncd/triggers), it would be nice 👼 (we would be able to list all tekton related resource at once, not polluting or being polluted by all). And each tekton components can define their own (like tekton-pipelines here, tekton-triggers for triggers, …)

Fix #1246

/cc @sbwsg @dibyom @bobcatfish @imjasonh
/ping @siamaksade

Signed-off-by: Vincent Demeester [email protected]

Submitter Checklist

These are the criteria that every PR should meet, please check them off as you
review them:

See the contribution guide for more details.

Double check this list of stuff that's easy to miss:

Reviewer Notes

If API changes are included, additive changes must be approved by at least two OWNERS and backwards incompatible changes must be approved by more than 50% of the OWNERS, and they must first be added in a backwards compatible way.

Release Notes

Remove the category `all` for our CRD and have a `tekton` categorie that is shared with other tektoncd projects

This means Tekton struct won't show in `kubectl get all` but in
`kubectl get tekton` 😉.

Signed-off-by: Vincent Demeester <[email protected]>
@tekton-robot tekton-robot requested review from bobcatfish, dibyom, imjasonh and a user January 16, 2020 16:47
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes Trying to make the CLA bot happy with ppl from different companies work on one commit label Jan 16, 2020
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 16, 2020
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jan 16, 2020

Could it support both all and tekton?

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jan 16, 2020

oh sorry, nevermind, i see the original issue.

/lgtm

@tekton-robot tekton-robot assigned ghost Jan 16, 2020
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 16, 2020
Copy link
Member

@dibyom dibyom left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@chmouel
Copy link
Member

chmouel commented Jan 17, 2020

yeah all is a pretty bad place for user level stuff...

there was some dicussions about it sometime ago in this operator-framework issue :

operator-framework/operator-lifecycle-manager#631 (comment)

/lgtm

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dibyom

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 17, 2020
@tekton-robot tekton-robot merged commit f4132a2 into tektoncd:master Jan 17, 2020
@vdemeester vdemeester deleted the 1246-crd-categories branch January 17, 2020 17:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cla: yes Trying to make the CLA bot happy with ppl from different companies work on one commit lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

What should be the CRDs categories for Tekton ?
5 participants