Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add omitempty for SchedulerName, ImagePullSecrets, HostNetwork #3032

Merged

Conversation

danielhelfand
Copy link
Member

Changes

This pull request adds omitempty for the following pod template fields:

  • SchedulerName
  • ImagePullSecrets
  • HostNetwork

As documented in #17, SchedulerName and HostNetwork are designated as optional fields and as such should be omitted if not declared. Why ImagePullSecrets is not considered optional seems interesting to me, and perhaps should be discussed a bit further before being introduced. But overall, it might have been overlooked when introducing #2547.

Please let me know if there should be further discussions with regard to this being a breaking change.

Submitter Checklist

  • Includes tests (if functionality changed/added)
  • Includes docs (if user facing)
  • Commit messages follow commit message best practices
  • Release notes block has been filled in or deleted (only if no user facing changes)

Reviewer Notes

If API changes are included, additive changes must be approved by at least two OWNERS and backwards incompatible changes must be approved by more than 50% of the OWNERS, and they must first be added in a backwards compatible way.

Release Notes

Omit SchedulerName, HostNetwork, and ImagePullSecrets if not declared for PodTemplate

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 30, 2020
@tekton-robot tekton-robot requested review from pritidesai and a user July 30, 2020 18:39
@danielhelfand
Copy link
Member Author

/kind bug

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. label Jul 30, 2020
@imjasonh
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

This doesn't qualify as a breaking change because users shouldn't have been depending on specifics like "" being returned in JSON responses from the server.

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 30, 2020
@danielhelfand
Copy link
Member Author

/lgtm

This doesn't qualify as a breaking change because users shouldn't have been depending on specifics like "" being returned in JSON responses from the server.

Thanks for the clarification. I guess my concern is more about the request for developers working around the API. Those fields are included even when not declared (e.g., when I tried to introduce pod template support in tkn). That being said, I would consider that to be unexpected.

@danielhelfand danielhelfand force-pushed the pod_template_optional_fields branch from ee3d62e to ca8e352 Compare July 30, 2020 19:06
@tekton-robot tekton-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 30, 2020
Copy link
Member

@jlpettersson jlpettersson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 30, 2020
@pritidesai
Copy link
Member

/approve

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: pritidesai

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 30, 2020
@tekton-robot tekton-robot merged commit 87302d2 into tektoncd:master Jul 30, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants