Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Comparisons between PATN and PATN_Fine #66

Open
Honlan opened this issue Feb 12, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Comparisons between PATN and PATN_Fine #66

Honlan opened this issue Feb 12, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@Honlan
Copy link

Honlan commented Feb 12, 2020

Hello. Thanks for your awesome work.

I found that the generator of PATN uses instance norm, while that of PATN_Fine uses batch norm (models/networks.py L119 define_G).

What's more, PATN uses lsgan while PATN_Fine doesn't (--no_lsgan).

Could you explain for me why you make such changes?

Thanks a lot.

@jessemelpolio
Copy link
Collaborator

Our initial intention is trying to stabilize the training process and reduce artifacts. These techniques are of some help to these aspects but show no further potential to improve the image quality quite a lot since batch norm is not sensitive as instance norm in capturing the style statistics of a single person.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants