You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There were some discussions about dropping pylint before #810 (comment)
Several big issues for pylint:
Slow: pylint runs check 1-2 second/file while black and pyupgrade runs very fast.
No auto-lint: It has to be adjusted manually. In some situations, you have to be really creative to make pylint happy.
Positive side:
tensorflow core repo stays with pylint so it helps us to align with the community. Though we change the max-width to 88 (not 80), and use 4 spaces (not 2) already so our pylint script is not exactly from tensorflow's core repo already.
On a side node, to submit a PR to tensorflow core repo and make pylint happy is not very easy nowadays. This actually caused quite a few unnecessary commits in tensorflow' core repo.
There were some discussions about dropping pylint before #810 (comment)
Several big issues for pylint:
Positive side:
On a side node, to submit a PR to tensorflow core repo and make pylint happy is not very easy nowadays. This actually caused quite a few unnecessary commits in tensorflow' core repo.
We might consider dropping pylint if agree? @terrytangyuan @BryanCutler @vlasenkoalexey @dmitrievanthony
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: