-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 233
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Concurrent mode #217
Comments
Thanks @FredyC! Concurrent mode is still something I have to wrap my head around and what it means for this package. I'm really curious to know if react-test-renderer is going to continue being supported going forward. It seems to have been forgotten or given minimal love in recent times. An issue I raised with it has gone unanswered for months (in their defence, it's not a deal breaker for us so I haven't pushed it harder myself either). |
I tried to use the unstable API from React called I can say supporting CM for now is kinda early but its good that this library in the future could provide support on CM mode so that library author can also rely to this library. Can I say at least experimental version? I guess. |
Hi @denniscual, This library uses As far as I'm aware, |
@mpeyper hey thanks for the information. Im not aware of the implementation details of this library. That's being said, I assume upgrading to a version of Thanks btw. |
I'm not sure we should be aiming to support unstable APIs & should wait until concurrent mode is more solidified with React. However, looking at this comment in RTL, you might be able to use concurrent mode with react-dom, which we'll be supporting as a renderer soon, you can see it's progress here – #510 If anyone feels like there's more to discuss then we can re-open this issue. |
I already open the issue for
@testing-library/react
(testing-library/react-testing-library#509) and it might good idea to have a separate issue for tracking changes in this library as well.Given this library utilizes
react-test-renderer
instead ofreact-dom
it might require slightly different implementation. However, it seems there are no commits to that package regarding concurrent mode.@gaearon if you notice this issue by any chance, can you clarify if this something that wasn't simply covered yet and if there is a plan for it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: