Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ramda-fantasy #130

Closed
puffnfresh opened this issue Jan 19, 2017 · 6 comments
Closed

ramda-fantasy #130

puffnfresh opened this issue Jan 19, 2017 · 6 comments

Comments

@puffnfresh
Copy link

Would it be reasonable to have ramda-fantasy bindings in this project?

@KiaraGrouwstra
Copy link
Member

Since they're technically imported from their own library rather than Ramda, I wonder if it works to import typings for that through this.
That said, I'd make a terrible bureaucrat, feel free to experiment and make PRs. If it'd need to be put into a separate thing that's something we can still do as well anyway.

@KiaraGrouwstra
Copy link
Member

Related: I already tried including typings for the fantasy land data types as they technically are used within Ramda as well. That said typing those was still problematic due to current TS limitations. But that might help a bit.
That said, AFAIK ramda-fantasy would potentially be merged into Sanctuary, and that's already gotten its own typings repo as well.

@xeob
Copy link

xeob commented Jan 19, 2017

@tycho01: I'm sorry for a bit off topic/silly/noob question here, but not sure where to ask regarding it. What TypeScript limitations do you have in mind? I'm curious to learn more regarding that. A link elsewhere will suffice. Thanks.

@KiaraGrouwstra
Copy link
Member

@knikel rest assured I learned about this only recently myself. :)

@xeob
Copy link

xeob commented Jan 19, 2017

Very enlightening read. Thank you!

@KiaraGrouwstra
Copy link
Member

Continuing discussion in #186.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants