Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: ✏️ remove some nested if #1706

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 27, 2024

Conversation

stormslowly
Copy link
Member

@stormslowly stormslowly commented Nov 27, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • 新功能

    • 引入了 extract_package_info 函数,以简化包信息的提取逻辑。
    • 改进了对 CommonJS require 调用的处理,增强了对异步依赖的管理。
  • 改进

    • 优化了 check_duplicates 方法,简化了包信息提取的流程。
    • 更新了 mark_async 函数,提升了异步模块的识别和依赖收集逻辑。

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 27, 2024

Walkthrough

此次更改引入了两个主要功能:在duplicate_package_checker.rs中添加了extract_package_info函数,以简化从模块中提取包信息的逻辑,并在async_module.rs中更新了AsyncModule结构及其方法,以改进对异步依赖的处理。这些更改提高了代码的可读性和可维护性,简化了相关方法的实现。

Changes

文件路径 更改摘要
crates/mako/src/plugins/duplicate_package_checker.rs 添加了fn extract_package_info(module: &Module) -> Option<PackageInfo>函数,更新了check_duplicates方法以使用filter_map简化逻辑。
crates/mako/src/visitors/async_module.rs 更新了visit_mut_exprvisit_mut_module_items方法,增强了对CommonJS require调用的处理,修改了mark_async函数以简化异步模块的识别。

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • sorrycc

兔子欢快跳跃,
代码更新真美妙。
提取包信息,
异步依赖更清晰。
维护性提升了,
代码如春花般绽放! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Walkthrough

This pull request refactors code by removing nested if statements to improve readability and maintainability. The changes involve the introduction of helper functions and the use of more concise expressions.

Changes

File Summary
duplicate_package_checker.rs Introduced extract_package_info function to simplify and replace nested if statements with filter_map.
async_module.rs Replaced nested if with then for cleaner conditional logic.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
crates/mako/src/plugins/duplicate_package_checker.rs (2)

50-72: 函数实现清晰,但建议增强错误处理

代码使用 Option 链式调用很好地处理了空值情况,实现了关注点分离。不过有以下几点建议:

  1. 建议对 semver::Version::parse 的错误进行更详细的处理,而不是简单地用 ok()? 忽略
  2. raw_json 变量名可以更具描述性,比如 package_metadata

建议按如下方式改进错误处理:

- let version = semver::Version::parse(version.as_str().unwrap()).ok()?;
+ let version_str = version.as_str().ok_or_else(|| "version must be a string")?;
+ let version = semver::Version::parse(version_str)
+     .map_err(|e| format!("invalid version format: {}", e))
+     .ok()?;

120-123: 代码简化得当,可考虑性能优化

使用 filter_map 和新的 extract_package_info 函数成功简化了代码,提高了可读性。不过对于大型模块图,可以考虑以下优化:

  1. 考虑使用 par_iter() 进行并行处理
  2. 可以直接使用 collect() 而不是 for_eachpush

建议改进如下:

- .filter_map(extract_package_info)
- .for_each(|package_info| {
-     packages.push(package_info);
- });
+ .filter_map(extract_package_info)
+ .collect::<Vec<_>>();

如果需要并行处理,可以考虑引入 rayon

use rayon::prelude::*;
// ...
.par_iter()
.filter_map(extract_package_info)
.collect::<Vec<_>>();
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cb5bc5f and ae6b842.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • crates/mako/src/plugins/duplicate_package_checker.rs (3 hunks)
  • crates/mako/src/visitors/async_module.rs (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
crates/mako/src/visitors/async_module.rs (1)

221-221: 使用 then 方法简化逻辑

第 221 行中,使用 then 方法对 Option 进行了链式调用,简化了代码逻辑,提升了可读性。

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 27, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 95.00000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 55.28%. Comparing base (cb5bc5f) to head (ae6b842).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...ates/mako/src/plugins/duplicate_package_checker.rs 94.73% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1706   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   55.28%   55.28%           
=======================================
  Files         175      175           
  Lines       17696    17699    +3     
=======================================
+ Hits         9783     9785    +2     
- Misses       7913     7914    +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@stormslowly stormslowly merged commit b6f638d into master Nov 27, 2024
21 checks passed
@stormslowly stormslowly deleted the chore/idiomatic_concise_rust_1127 branch November 27, 2024 09:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant