Define license

[nodeg]

A license for this project is missing.

[agraul]

That's a pity, this project should be Free Software / Open Source!

Any preference for a license @juliogonzalez ? Since all contributions were done by SUSE employees as part of their work we shouldn't face any issue adding the license (as long as it's compatible with https://opensource.suse.com/legal/policy)

[juliogonzalez]

I know I am going to cause some controversy, but my preference is GPL.

I usually license my own stuff as GPL v3. If someone prefers 2.1, I will not opposite.

[juliogonzalez]

I know I am going to cause some controversy, but my preference is GPL.

I usually license my own stuff as GPL v3. If someone prefers 2.1, I will not opposite.

[agraul]

I know I am going to cause some controversy

Sorry to disappoint you 😆

I haven't yet contributed to this repo, so don't pay too much attention to my preference. That said, GPL v3 is what I default to when it comes to licenses.