Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(isBase32): Add option for Crockford's base 32 alternative #1888
feat(isBase32): Add option for Crockford's base 32 alternative #1888
Changes from 1 commit
8eb1a1c
14aa576
177be3d
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would suggest you move this test out to its own
it()
statement so it is more clear precisely what is being tested. At least many other tests are split up like this. See'should validate JSON'
and'should validate JSON with primitives'
.Examples to the contrary are found as well (
'should validate ISSNs'
has everything in oneit()
statement), so I suppose a clarification of the convention here would be nice, but that's a bigger topic.