Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Top-navigation: Move index between practices and about #77

Closed
mcking65 opened this issue May 11, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Top-navigation: Move index between practices and about #77

mcking65 opened this issue May 11, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@mcking65
Copy link
Contributor

@isaacdurazo, the "Index" link feels out of place to me. It seems like we should have the two primary sections, patterns and practices, juxtaposed. What do you think of moving Index between practices and about?

Consider how I have described the APG structure in the new Introduction section:

The APG is organized into two major sections: patterns and practices. Each pattern explains how to make a common user interface element, such as a button, menu, or dialog, accessible, and provides functional example implementations of the pattern. The practices section gives in-depth explanation of how to satisfy a variety of accessibility needs that surface when making rich internet application experiences accessible. For instance, the practices section on providing accessible names and descriptions gives detailed descriptions of seven different naming techniques as well as a table providing guidance for naming more than 80 types of elements.

Also consider that the index page will eventually cover all content, not just examples.

Originally posted by @mcking65 in #60 (comment)

@isaacdurazo
Copy link
Member

This issue has been addressed in this commit. Sorry I reference the original issue where this was mentioned

@mcking65
Copy link
Contributor Author

Verified fixed in #62!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants