Request: consider extension store implementation and review policy during specification process #24
Labels
inconsistency
Inconsistent behavior across browsers
spec clarification
Needs clarification when specified
Context
In practice, the extension manifest is a combination of 1) technical specification, 2) browser implementation quirks/bugs, 3) the technical limitations of the web store, and 4) the review policies of the web store
Examples:
3. The Firefox web store has a maximum file size of 4mb: mozilla/addons#662
4. For Manifest V3: the Chrome Web Store has a review policy that "Specifically, all logic must be included in the extension's package", but allows for "remote configuration files": https://developer.chrome.com/docs/extensions/mv3/intro/mv3-overview/#remotely-hosted-code
Request
When standardizing the "manifest", also consider any relevant web store factors — i.e., the "API" of the web stores
Web stores can/should be able to have different review policies, but aligning on standard terminology (e.g., "logic") would help simplify debate
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: