Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Way to filter from files currently opened buffers #212

Closed
Svalorzen opened this issue Apr 15, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

Way to filter from files currently opened buffers #212

Svalorzen opened this issue Apr 15, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@Svalorzen
Copy link

Since command-t provides a way to look between buffers only, it would be nice if there was a way to remove buffer entries from files when looking to open new files (and thus buffers). This would prevent populating the list of files with entries which have already been opened, and present the user with a more condensed list which only contains files which have yet to be added to the opened buffers.

So if a user already knows it has opened a buffer, he will look in the buffers only; otherwise he will look in the unopened files only. Maybe an option?

@wincent
Copy link
Owner

wincent commented Apr 18, 2016

I'd be willing to accept a PR that made this an option, as long as it didn't regress performance.

It's not the kind of thing I would use myself. I typically have anywhere between 10 and 200 buffers open, but I'm working in a repo with over a million files, so filtering out less than 0.001% of the files wouldn't be super valuable to me.

@wincent
Copy link
Owner

wincent commented Jul 23, 2022

Closing this one due to inactivity. Note that this possibility was mentioned as an idea on #107 — so if anybody wants to discuss it further, doing so over there is probably a good idea (to keep all the discussion in one place).

@wincent wincent closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jul 23, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants