This README provides a step-by-step breakdown of the solution to the problem of counting fair pairs in an array. We'll cover the approach for each language: C++, Java, JavaScript, Python, and Go.
Given a 0-indexed
integer array nums
and two integers lower
and upper
, we need to count the number of pairs (i, j)
such that:
- ( 0 \leq i < j < n ) (i.e., ( i ) should be less than ( j ))
- ( \text{lower} \leq \text{nums}[i] + \text{nums}[j] \leq \text{upper} ) (i.e., the sum of the elements should lie between
lower
andupper
)
To solve this problem efficiently:
- Sort the Array: We start by sorting the array
nums
to simplify the process of finding pairs. - Iterate and Search: For each element
nums[i]
, calculate the range of values thatnums[j]
should lie within to meet the conditions. Use binary search to quickly find the count of validj
indices for eachi
. - Binary Search Utility Functions: Implement functions for binary search that will find the lower and upper bounds of the range that
nums[j]
can fall into for a valid pair.
- Time Complexity: (O(n \log n)) due to sorting and binary search for each element.
- Space Complexity: (O(1)) (or (O(n)) if the sorted array copy is counted as extra space).
- Start by sorting
nums
. This enables us to efficiently find the range of valid pairs for each element.
- For each element at index
i
, calculate the minimum and maximum values (minVal
andmaxVal
) thatnums[j]
(where ( j > i )) must satisfy.
- Use
lower_bound
to find the smallest indexj
wherenums[j] >= minVal
. - Use
upper_bound
to find the smallest indexj
wherenums[j] > maxVal
.
- For each
i
, add the number of valid pairs(i, j)
by subtracting the lower bound index from the upper bound index.
- Start by sorting
nums
to make the search for valid pairs faster.
- Implement custom
lowerBound
andupperBound
methods.lowerBound
finds the first indexj
wherenums[j] >= minVal
.upperBound
finds the first indexj
wherenums[j] > maxVal
.
- For each index
i
, calculateminVal
andmaxVal
based on the range[lower, upper]
.
- For each
i
, find the range of valid indicesj
using the custom binary search functions. - Add the difference between
upper bound
andlower bound
indices to the total count.
- Sort
nums
to streamline finding valid pairs later.
- Create
lowerBound
andupperBound
helper functions.lowerBound
finds the first indexj
wherenums[j] >= minVal
.upperBound
finds the first indexj
wherenums[j] > maxVal
.
- For each index
i
, determineminVal
andmaxVal
for the current element as the required bounds fornums[j]
.
- For each
i
, use the helper functions to find the valid range of indices forj
. - Increment the count based on the difference between the indices found by the helper functions.
- Begin by sorting
nums
to enable efficient range searching.
- Use custom functions
lower_bound
andupper_bound
.lower_bound
finds the first position wherenums[j] >= minVal
.upper_bound
finds the first position wherenums[j] > maxVal
.
- For each element
nums[i]
, calculateminVal
andmaxVal
for valid pairs.
- For each
i
, determine the valid range forj
indices and count the pairs by subtracting the lower bound index from the upper bound index.
- Start by sorting
nums
to make it easier to locate valid pairs.
- Implement
lowerBound
andupperBound
functions.lowerBound
finds the index wherenums[j] >= minVal
.upperBound
finds the index wherenums[j] > maxVal
.
- For each element in
nums
, calculateminVal
andmaxVal
based on thelower
andupper
constraints.
- For each
i
, uselowerBound
andupperBound
to get the range of validj
indices. - Add the count of valid pairs to the total based on the difference in indices.
The main strategy is to:
- Sort the array.
- For each index
i
, find the valid range forj
using binary search functions. - Count the number of pairs in this range.
Each language implements the same approach, with minor variations due to syntax and standard library differences.
This structured approach ensures that the solution is both efficient and easy to understand across different programming languages. Each step in the implementation is designed to make the most of binary search and sorting for an optimal solution.