Add generic PropTypes.objectOf(PropTypes.shape).isRequired

[skube]

Not an issue, more of a possible request...
One PropType we use often, but is not included in this extension, is the generic : PropTypes.objectOf(PropTypes.shape).isRequired

Not sure if it was a conscious decision or if there is some other reason for not including it.

[xabikos]

@skube sorry for my late reply.

Why would you like to do this? In my understanding this is equivalant with
PropTypes.shape({}).isRequired
or am I missing something?

[skube]

I could be wrong, but I think there is a subtle difference as described in this Stack Overflow

[pupretiDev]

Say we have a case where a prop named 'someProp' is equated as :
someProp= {
dynamickey : {
knownKey1: ,
knownKey2:,
and so on
}
}
Here we do not know the type of dynamic key but we know for sure that its value is an object of all known key types.
Thus to define PropTypes for someProp we may do something like this
someProp: PropTypes.objectOf(PropTypes.shape(
{
knownKey: PropTypes.string,
knownKey2:PropTypes.number
and so on
}
))