You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When running test.py to test a picture of Celeb_iid, such as 000990.jpg, the effect is very poor.
faca_hq is right.
but final result is poor
The parameters for running test.py are the same as default
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Since that the face_hq is used as the GT to finetune the model, the final result won't be better than face_hq. In order to get a better restoration result, you can increase the fine-tuning steps during inference or try to train a new model with more inner loop fine-tuning steps.
When running test.py to test a picture of Celeb_iid, such as 000990.jpg, the effect is very poor.
![WechatIMG15](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/60536525/339190053-c7b418de-71b1-409c-bfa3-fb550ef36b40.jpg?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.xqF0zq7EthUpxMFKIIvbGyMFKfl32S8mutJvpNc26Rw)
![WechatIMG16](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/60536525/339190357-5efd0746-dea2-4c93-890a-88ef40bad9c1.jpg?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.6EnClIw9PvamFY0UhNYPXbKPPjq59YAbbm-dMC2Pagw)
faca_hq is right.
but final result is poor
The parameters for running test.py are the same as default
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: