Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Static analysis check based on imports in source files #126

Merged

Conversation

cesarsotovalero
Copy link
Collaborator

Fix #125

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 5, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #126 (139c48a) into master (3e15d36) will increase coverage by 0.66%.
The diff coverage is 35.29%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #126      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     39.96%   40.62%   +0.66%     
- Complexity      178      192      +14     
============================================
  Files            40       41       +1     
  Lines          1126     1184      +58     
  Branches         84       87       +3     
============================================
+ Hits            450      481      +31     
- Misses          635      662      +27     
  Partials         41       41              

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3e15d36...139c48a. Read the comment docs.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Apr 5, 2022

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot E 3 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 7 Code Smells

34.8% 34.8% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@cesarsotovalero cesarsotovalero merged commit 5c13f9d into master Apr 5, 2022
@cesarsotovalero cesarsotovalero deleted the static_analysis_check_based_on_imports_in_source_files branch April 8, 2022 08:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] Dependency usages from annotations with RetentionPolicy.SOURCE are not considered as used
1 participant