Processors should be considered as rightful dependencies #82
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #82 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 6.00% 5.96% -0.05%
Complexity 23 23
===========================================
Files 26 26
Lines 966 973 +7
Branches 133 130 -3
===========================================
Hits 58 58
- Misses 896 903 +7
Partials 12 12 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
|
Side-effect on the |
Hi @afillatre, I'm OK with the proposal. I agree the |
| private Set<Artifact> collectUsedArtifacts(Map<Artifact, Set<String>> artifactClassMap, | ||
| Set<String> referencedClasses) { | ||
| Set<Artifact> usedArtifacts = new HashSet<>(); | ||
| // find for used members in each class in the dependency classes | ||
| for (String clazz : referencedClasses) { | ||
| Artifact artifact = findArtifactForClassName(artifactClassMap, clazz); | ||
| if (artifact != null) { | ||
| if (!artifactUsedClassesMap.containsKey(artifact)) { | ||
| artifactUsedClassesMap.put(artifact, new HashSet<>()); | ||
| } | ||
| artifactUsedClassesMap.get(artifact).add(clazz); | ||
| usedArtifacts.add(artifact); | ||
| } | ||
| findArtifactForClassName(artifactClassMap, clazz) | ||
| .ifPresent(artifact -> artifactUsedClassesMap.putIfAbsent(artifact, new HashSet<>())); | ||
| } | ||
| return usedArtifacts; | ||
| return artifactUsedClassesMap.keySet(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for this refactoring!
There are too many null in the project :)
| @MavenTest | ||
| @DisplayName("Test that DepClean runs in a Maven project with processors") | ||
| void processor_used(MavenExecutionResult result) { | ||
| assertThat(result).isSuccessful().out() | ||
| .plain().contains( | ||
| "-------------------------------------------------------", | ||
| " D E P C L E A N A N A L Y S I S R E S U L T S", | ||
| "-------------------------------------------------------", | ||
| "USED DIRECT DEPENDENCIES [1]: ", | ||
| " org.mapstruct:mapstruct-processor:1.4.2.Final:provided (1 MB)", | ||
| "USED INHERITED DEPENDENCIES [0]: ", | ||
| "USED TRANSITIVE DEPENDENCIES [1]: ", | ||
| " com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core:2.12.2:compile (356 KB)", | ||
| "POTENTIALLY UNUSED DIRECT DEPENDENCIES [1]: ", | ||
| " com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind:2.12.2:compile (1 MB)", | ||
| "POTENTIALLY UNUSED INHERITED DEPENDENCIES [0]: ", | ||
| "POTENTIALLY UNUSED TRANSITIVE DEPENDENCIES [1]: ", | ||
| " com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-annotations:2.12.2:compile (73 KB)" | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nice that you included a proper IT!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I had a very hard time debugging the plugin though, maybe I'm doing something wrong... I was unable to catch a breakpoint in the core project.
With more ITs, this big assertion can be refined, though.
|
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! |
Co-authored-by: Alexandre Fillatre <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: cesarsotovalero <[email protected]>
fixes #76