Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Engineer can identify when the P2P module is synced with the rollup source #4

Closed
PhilWindle opened this issue Mar 2, 2023 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@PhilWindle
Copy link
Collaborator

PhilWindle commented Mar 2, 2023

Once started, the P2P module should use it's configured rollup source to retrieve rollups and reconcile it's tx pool. It should report it's current synced rollup number via a status interface. This interface should indicate it's status via a 'state' value on it's status interface.

@PhilWindle PhilWindle added this to A3 Mar 2, 2023
@PhilWindle PhilWindle converted this from a draft issue Mar 2, 2023
@PhilWindle PhilWindle added this to the 📜 Deploy a Contract milestone Mar 7, 2023
@spypsy spypsy self-assigned this Mar 9, 2023
@spypsy spypsy moved this from Todo to In Progress in A3 Mar 9, 2023
@spypsy spypsy moved this from In Progress to In Review in A3 Mar 14, 2023
@PhilWindle PhilWindle moved this from In Review to Done in A3 Apr 3, 2023
ludamad pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 14, 2023
ludamad pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 17, 2023
ludamad pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 17, 2023
ludamad pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 14, 2023
* Fix to bootstrap.sh after move into submodule (#1)

* Updated bootstrap now that bberg may be a submodule, and now that cpp subdir exists

* fix gitignore, wasnt properly ignoring cpp/build*

* fix the barretenberg cpp formatting pre-commit hook now that barretenberg iss its own repo and may be a submodule

* Contrived change.

* Revert "Contrived change."

This reverts commit ea18e58180f70a5e0f0a3419f4beba461d6917cb.

* Revert "Revert "Contrived change.""

This reverts commit 6ad33bccc4e5a1d76467a61b0d18d369fd32988e.

* Introduce cpp to paths.

* More cpp path.

* Cl/mum merge (#4)

* Initial merge. Still has conflicts.

* Tidied up bigfield and biggroup

* Builds.

* Order constants.

* Fix.

* Make more tests pass.

* Update circuit change detection stuff to be local to tests.

* Include header.

* Cleanup and settings.

* Path updates.

* Path updates.

Co-authored-by: Rumata888 <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: David Banks <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Rumata888 <[email protected]>
ludamad pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 19, 2023
Fix link to emergencyWithdraw
ludamad pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 21, 2023
Fix link to emergencyWithdraw
@iAmMichaelConnor iAmMichaelConnor removed this from A3 Jul 26, 2023
codygunton pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 23, 2024
* Fix to bootstrap.sh after move into submodule (#1)

* Updated bootstrap now that bberg may be a submodule, and now that cpp subdir exists

* fix gitignore, wasnt properly ignoring cpp/build*

* fix the barretenberg cpp formatting pre-commit hook now that barretenberg iss its own repo and may be a submodule

* Contrived change.

* Revert "Contrived change."

This reverts commit 68aff9c99c683956f417d069360ca36deb5e351c.

* Revert "Revert "Contrived change.""

This reverts commit 3eee2fdd5133490ae57fd2db94c645891e3e8fcf.

* Introduce cpp to paths.

* More cpp path.

* Cl/mum merge (#4)

* Initial merge. Still has conflicts.

* Tidied up bigfield and biggroup

* Builds.

* Order constants.

* Fix.

* Make more tests pass.

* Update circuit change detection stuff to be local to tests.

* Include header.

* Cleanup and settings.

* Path updates.

* Path updates.

Co-authored-by: Rumata888 <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: David Banks <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Rumata888 <[email protected]>
ludamad added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 6, 2024
Overview:
If you are in a scenario where you have a failing call to check_circuit
and wish to get more information out of it than just the gate index, you
can use this feature to get a stack trace, see example below.

Usage instructions:
- On ubuntu (or our mainframe accounts) use `sudo apt-get install
libdw-dev` to support trace printing
- Use `cmake --preset clang16-dbg-fast-circuit-check-traces` and `cmake
--build --preset clang16-dbg-fast-circuit-check-traces` to enable the
backward-cpp dependency through the CHECK_CIRCUIT_STACKTRACES CMake
variable.
- Run any case where you have a failing check_circuit call, you will now
have a stack trace illuminating where this constraint was added in code.

Caveats:
- This works best for code that is not overly generic, i.e. where just
the sequence of function calls carries a lot of information. It is
possible to tag extra data along with the stack trace, this can be done
as a followup, please leave feedback if desired.
- There are certain functions like `assert_equals` that can cause gates
that occur _before_ them to fail. If this would be useful to
automatically report, please leave feedback.

Example:
```
[ RUN      ] standard_circuit_constructor.test_check_circuit_broken
Stack trace (most recent call last):
#4    Source "_deps/gtest-src/googletest/src/gtest.cc", line 2845, in Run
       2842:   if (!Test::HasFatalFailure() && !Test::IsSkipped()) {
       2843:     // This doesn't throw as all user code that can throw are wrapped into
       2844:     // exception handling code.
      >2845:     test->Run();
       2846:   }
       2847: 
       2848:   if (test != nullptr) {
#3    Source "_deps/gtest-src/googletest/src/gtest.cc", line 2696, in Run
       2693:   // GTEST_SKIP().
       2694:   if (!HasFatalFailure() && !IsSkipped()) {
       2695:     impl->os_stack_trace_getter()->UponLeavingGTest();
      >2696:     internal::HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported(this, &Test::TestBody,
       2697:                                                   "the test body");
       2698:   }
#2  | Source "_deps/gtest-src/googletest/src/gtest.cc", line 2657, in HandleSehExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void>
    |  2655: #if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
    |  2656:     try {
    | >2657:       return HandleSehExceptionsInMethodIfSupported(object, method, location);
    |  2658:     } catch (const AssertionException&) {  // NOLINT
    |  2659:       // This failure was reported already.
      Source "_deps/gtest-src/googletest/src/gtest.cc", line 2621, in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void>
       2618:   }
       2619: #else
       2620:   (void)location;
      >2621:   return (object->*method)();
       2622: #endif  // GTEST_HAS_SEH
       2623: }
#1    Source "/mnt/user-data/adam/aztec-packages/barretenberg/cpp/src/barretenberg/circuit_checker/standard_circuit_builder.test.cpp", line 464, in TestBody
        461:     uint32_t d_idx = circuit_constructor.add_variable(d);
        462:     circuit_constructor.create_add_gate({ a_idx, b_idx, c_idx, fr::one(), fr::one(), fr::neg_one(), fr::zero() });
        463: 
      > 464:     circuit_constructor.create_add_gate({ d_idx, c_idx, a_idx, fr::one(), fr::neg_one(), fr::neg_one(), fr::zero() });
        465: 
        466:     bool result = CircuitChecker::check(circuit_constructor);
        467:     EXPECT_EQ(result, false);
#0    Source "/mnt/user-data/adam/aztec-packages/barretenberg/cpp/src/barretenberg/stdlib_circuit_builders/standard_circuit_builder.cpp", line 22, in create_add_gate
         19: {
         20:     this->assert_valid_variables({ in.a, in.b, in.c });
         21: 
      >  22:     blocks.arithmetic.populate_wires(in.a, in.b, in.c);
         23:     blocks.arithmetic.q_m().emplace_back(FF::zero());
         24:     blocks.arithmetic.q_1().emplace_back(in.a_scaling);
         25:     blocks.arithmetic.q_2().emplace_back(in.b_scaling);
gate number4
```
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants