You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While testing CI by pushing on devnet it seems sometimes deploying contracts failed if the mainnet fork hadn't also re-deployed.
This should really be the case since we deploy new L1 contracts before re-deploying nodes, therefore having a clean slate.
The error was DB has no contract with address 0x05425591680496cbc66f87c6e2a7669f253c205e4487e2046e72a6d8a74aa73b when trying to run aztec bootstrap
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Fixes#7277Fixes#7477
This PR adds a bootstrapping job to the automatic devnet deployments
which:
- Creates an account which is used to:
- Deploy canonical contracts `AuthRegistry`, `KeyRegistry` & `GasToken`
(soon to be fee juice)
- Deploy 2 contracts, `TokenContract` (named `DEV`) and an `FPCContract`
for DEV.
- Updates 2 S3 buckets with the addresses of the deployed contracts (L1
& L2)
Other changes:
- L1 contracts now re-deploy by default. #7530
- Mainnet fork also deploys by default as I ran into some issues #7531
While testing CI by pushing on
devnet
it seems sometimes deploying contracts failed if the mainnet fork hadn't also re-deployed.This should really be the case since we deploy new L1 contracts before re-deploying nodes, therefore having a clean slate.
The error was
DB has no contract with address 0x05425591680496cbc66f87c6e2a7669f253c205e4487e2046e72a6d8a74aa73b
when trying to runaztec bootstrap
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: