Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More flexible Oil Cracker structure #1297

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 25, 2017
Merged

More flexible Oil Cracker structure #1297

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 25, 2017

Conversation

JohannesGaessler
Copy link
Collaborator

Currently the structure of the Oil Cracker is unneccessarily restrictive.
You currently have to put the Input Hatch on the left hand side, an the Output Hatch on the right hand side.
This PR would make it so that the Oil Cracker also accepts Input Hatches on the right hand side and Output Hatches on the left hand side.
Input/Output Hatches must still be on opposite sides of one another.

Also, Energy/Maintenance Hatches no longer need to be on the middle ring but can also be put on the sides.

The Oil Cracker now also accepts Input Hatches on the right side and
Output Hatches on the left side.
Input/Output Hatches must be on opposite sides of one another.

Also, Energy/Maintenance Hatches no longer need to be on the middle ring
but can also be put on the sides.
@Antillar
Copy link

If only I could like it more than once.

"1x Maintenance Hatch (Any middle ring casing)",
"1x Energy Hatch (Any middle ring casing)",
"Clean Stainless Steel Machine Casings for the rest (18 at least!)"};
"1x Cracked Hydrocarbon Output Hatch (Any left/right side casing)",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

right/left is more logical since they are on the opposite sides and the first one was left/right

@Blood-Asp Blood-Asp merged commit d6cbc47 into Blood-Asp:unstable Nov 25, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants