Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove --xblock-v3-enabled and useBlindedBlock variable #8511
Remove --xblock-v3-enabled and useBlindedBlock variable #8511
Changes from 1 commit
5c0fad7
30854e4
8fdd44d
52d6c38
ae20b68
73974e4
3534683
0e2c4ae
d18b280
f47afa5
996085c
a59953e
46356e2
6a6a685
1853058
2ec44e8
8ab3f75
fbe3836
d389a88
713f7e0
c469051
c98b937
f7b999f
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This whole if statement should be simplified. After this change, we have only one condition, if fallback data is present, we return unblinded executionPayload, otherwise we have the builderBid and return the blinded header.
Essentially, we can skip this, since it will never happen:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
well that's interesting, I understand the logic behind this clean up but wouldn't that be somehow a weird enforcement we would do? Every CL must have a EL in order to be fully functional in the network as a proposer, no? If so the first condition will always be true and even if you configure a builderBid we will default to use the fallback always isn't that so?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So, the way it works is that either the builder bid is present or the fallback is present. The two won't be present at the same time.