Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make app keepers public #951

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Aug 23, 2022
Merged

Make app keepers public #951

merged 7 commits into from
Aug 23, 2022

Conversation

alpe
Copy link
Contributor

@alpe alpe commented Aug 23, 2022

Resolves #881

This PR is based on the work from @faddat in PR #882 (💐) with the variable names renaming reverted.
Added deprecation annotation and formatting.

Note to reviewer: please squash and merge

@alpe alpe changed the title Keeper names review Make app keepers public Aug 23, 2022
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 23, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #951 (61a4342) into main (4525d51) will increase coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is 76.21%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #951      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   59.14%   59.18%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          51       51              
  Lines        6198     6198              
==========================================
+ Hits         3666     3668       +2     
+ Misses       2265     2264       -1     
+ Partials      267      266       -1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
app/test_access.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
app/test_helpers.go 0.84% <0.00%> (ø)
x/wasm/client/cli/query.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
x/wasm/types/types.go 56.32% <ø> (ø)
app/export.go 12.12% <4.16%> (ø)
app/app.go 88.91% <98.38%> (ø)
x/wasm/client/cli/tx.go 25.00% <100.00%> (ø)
x/wasm/ioutils/ioutil.go 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
x/wasm/keeper/keeper.go 88.57% <0.00%> (+0.33%) ⬆️

Copy link
Contributor

@pinosu pinosu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 👍

@alpe alpe merged commit 00082a2 into main Aug 23, 2022
@alpe alpe deleted the keeper-names_review branch August 23, 2022 15:01
@faddat faddat mentioned this pull request Oct 2, 2022
conorpp pushed a commit to wormhole-foundation/wasmd that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2023
* use ecosystem convention for keeper names in app.go

* fix linting

* Revert variable renaming

* Deprecate attribute access helper

* Formatting only

* Replace usage of deprecated test helper

* Address linter report

Co-authored-by: faddat <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Should we expose Keepers in app.go?
3 participants