ArrayOfString maxOccurs 1

[Griboedoff]

Hi!

<xsd:complexType name="ArrayOfString">
    <xsd:sequence>
        <xsd:element minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1" name="string" type="xsd:string"/>
    </xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>

For unknown reason when I use SoapCore ArrayOfString in wsdl generated with maxOccurs="1" instead of maxOccurs="unbounded" attribute like it generates in WCF.
I'm using xmlSerializer

What info I could provide?

[andersjonsson]

That's odd. In my own services ArrayOfString gets maxOccurs="unbounded" as expected.
What is the signature of the methods/objects with string-collections?

My suggestion would be to fork the repo, setting up a test with a small service to reproduce your issue.
That way you can debug into MetaBodyWriter and see what's going on

[Griboedoff]

In sample projects I use

[ServiceContract]
public class WebService
{
    [OperationContract]
    public void DoStuff(string[] arrayArg) {}
}

Ok, I'll try to fork when I have time to tinker it a bit)

[vidrenning]

I am able to reproduce this issue and uploaded a pull request for a fix. It is a regression of #960. I also added a test that can be used to reproduce this issue and verify that it is now fixed.

[Alexcei88]

I have updated to the 1.1.0.43 version and still see the same issue. It looks like the problem have not been fixed.

[vidrenning]

It works for me. Please give a small reproducible example of your issue.

[Alexcei88]

The contract of the service is the same as above one attached by Griboedoff.
The serializer is overriden to xml

options.SoapSerializer = SoapSerializer.XmlSerializer;

If I will switch to the default value (DataContract serializer), it is ok.

[vidrenning]

Just tested it again with v1.1.0.43 and the example class above. This is what I get:

<xsd:complexType name="ArrayOfString">
  <xsd:sequence>
    <xsd:element minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" name="string" type="xsd:string" />
  </xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>

As you can see, it shows maxOccurs="unbounded". Are you sure that you are using the newest version of the package? Are you looking at the right place for the ArrayOfString definition?

[Alexcei88]

Oh, sorry, Looks like it was the old version of library. Now it works.