Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Исправлены многие опечатки и неточности перевода #11

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Simplaf234-ghost
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@FrancescoBorzi
Copy link
Owner

@Viste @Winfidonarleyan can you please review ?

@Viste
Copy link

Viste commented Aug 31, 2020

can't agree with some of this "fixes"

@Winfidonarleyan
Copy link
Contributor

Agree with @Viste

@Simplaf234-ghost
Copy link
Contributor Author

can't agree with some of this "fixes"

Please list fixes you can’t agree with.

@FrancescoBorzi
Copy link
Owner

@Winfidonarleyan @Viste

@TheSCREWEDSoftware
Copy link

Was this document google translated (to be readable to more people even if no native speaker was available at the time) or actual translated?

The format changes are good changes since they get standard for the russians readers.

Like 58 and 59 i think they should stay as they are, since it's refering to All the exps and offical and not retail realmlist.

310 and 311 the old should stay. while is using a religion referenced (the christian way, raw translation) it's better than not having a contextual example as it does originally without the change.

@FrancescoBorzi i would just keep the format e.g "" to «» and ... to the cyrilic ... etc...

@Viste
Copy link

Viste commented Nov 28, 2024

can't agree with some of this "fixes"

Please list fixes you can’t agree with.

In the current translation, casual conversational language is used, but in the proposed version, it has turned into something that feels more like machine-translated text, leaning towards documentation rather than storytelling or narrative.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants