Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change Licence to MIT or LGPL? #25

Closed
MuellerSeb opened this issue Jul 18, 2019 · 5 comments
Closed

Change Licence to MIT or LGPL? #25

MuellerSeb opened this issue Jul 18, 2019 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@MuellerSeb
Copy link
Member

The GNU license is good, but has some conditions for users that are a bit to restrictive in my opinion. For example, the GNU GPL3 license demands the same license for derived software.

I think, GSTools should be usable by the biggest possible user group and therefore I would suggest the MIT license, which is "a short and simple permissive" one.

@MuellerSeb MuellerSeb added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 18, 2019
@MuellerSeb MuellerSeb added this to the 1.1 milestone Jul 18, 2019
@MuellerSeb
Copy link
Member Author

Any opinions on this?
@fhesze , @LSchueler , @AlrauneZ

@fhesze
Copy link

fhesze commented Aug 28, 2019 via email

@LSchueler
Copy link
Member

As GSTools being scientific software I believe that it should also incorporate the idea of free and open-source software, namely to promote the free exchange of ideas and technology. Therefore I don't like the idea that the MIT license allows people to modify the code without giving it back to the public.

A compromise is always the lesser GPL, which enforces people to publish modified versions of the code under the same license, but which still allows people to use the software in proprietary code. I don't think that you in any way shrink the size of the possible user group by using the LGPL.

@MuellerSeb
Copy link
Member Author

OK. I think we go with the LGPL3.0 then. If I understand it right, all you have to do, if you use this package in your code is to keep the LGPL license for the gstools part, right? It doesn't mean to use the LGPL in the rest of the 3rd party code?

@MuellerSeb MuellerSeb changed the title Change Licence to MIT Change Licence to MIT or LGPL? Aug 29, 2019
@MuellerSeb
Copy link
Member Author

Closing with: 1c8a0ef

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants