Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make routineType required in the BigQuery Routine resource #8573

Conversation

wj-chen
Copy link
Member

@wj-chen wj-chen commented Aug 7, 2023

Fixes hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#11919.

This field is required by the API.

If this PR is for Terraform, I acknowledge that I have:

  • Searched through the issue tracker for an open issue that this either resolves or contributes to, commented on it to claim it, and written "fixes {url}" or "part of {url}" in this PR description. If there were no relevant open issues, I opened one and commented that I would like to work on it (not necessary for very small changes).
  • Ensured that all new fields I added that can be set by a user appear in at least one example (for generated resources) or third_party test (for handwritten resources or update tests).
  • Generated Terraform providers, and ran make test and make lint in the generated providers to ensure it passes unit and linter tests.
  • Ran relevant acceptance tests using my own Google Cloud project and credentials (If the acceptance tests do not yet pass or you are unable to run them, please let your reviewer know).
  • Read Write release notes before writing my release note below.

Release Note Template for Downstream PRs (will be copied)

bigquery: made routineType required for Routine

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Hello! I am a robot. It looks like you are a community contributor. @trodge, a repository maintainer, has been assigned to review your changes. If you have not received review feedback within 2 business days, please leave a comment on this PR asking them to take a look.

You can help make sure that review is quick by doing a self-review and by running impacted tests locally.

@modular-magician modular-magician requested a review from trodge August 7, 2023 17:13
@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes:

Breaking Change(s) Detected

The following breaking change(s) were detected within your pull request.

  • Field routine_type changed from optional to required on google_bigquery_routine - reference

If you believe this detection to be incorrect please raise the concern with your reviewer. If you intend to make this change you will need to wait for a major release window. An override-breaking-change label can be added to allow merging.

Diff report

Your PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.

Terraform GA: Diff ( 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-))
Terraform Beta: Diff ( 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-))
TF Conversion: Diff ( 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-))

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Tests analytics

Total tests: 2921
Passed tests 2618
Skipped tests: 303
Affected tests: 0

$\textcolor{green}{\textsf{All tests passed in REPLAYING mode.}}$
View the build log

@wj-chen
Copy link
Member Author

wj-chen commented Aug 7, 2023

Not sure what's up with terraform-provider-breaking-change-test - the Details page shows that it was Successful.

@wj-chen
Copy link
Member Author

wj-chen commented Aug 10, 2023

Not sure what's up with terraform-provider-breaking-change-test - the Details page shows that it was Successful.

@trodge ^

@trodge
Copy link
Contributor

trodge commented Aug 11, 2023

Not sure what's up with terraform-provider-breaking-change-test - the Details page shows that it was Successful.

@trodge ^

I believe it reports failure when it detects a breaking change.

@wj-chen
Copy link
Member Author

wj-chen commented Aug 12, 2023

Not sure what's up with terraform-provider-breaking-change-test - the Details page shows that it was Successful.

@trodge ^

I believe it reports failure when it detects a breaking change.

I see thanks, then I will ignore it for now. Do you have any other thoughts on this change?

@trodge
Copy link
Contributor

trodge commented Aug 14, 2023

Have you created a separate PR with an upgrade guide as per these instructions?

@wj-chen
Copy link
Member Author

wj-chen commented Aug 15, 2023

Have you created a separate PR with an upgrade guide as per these instructions?

Created #8650

wj-chen added a commit to wj-chen/magic-modules that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2023
wj-chen added a commit to wj-chen/magic-modules that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2023
@trodge trodge added the override-breaking-change Allows a potential breaking change to be merged label Aug 15, 2023
@trodge trodge merged commit 1ac6933 into GoogleCloudPlatform:FEATURE-BRANCH-major-release-5.0.0 Aug 15, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
override-breaking-change Allows a potential breaking change to be merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants