Hotfix/incorrect mask positions

[oleksandr-pavlyk]

This PR fixes an issue found by @antonwolfy where the following test would not clear the assertion:

import dpctl.tensor as dpt
m = dpt.full((60, 80,), True)
assert m[m].size == m.size

This was caused by inclusive_scan_rec implementation unconditionally applying non-zero indicator transformation on the input data, even for the recursive call where it was unintended.

The fix is to add the transformer argument to the function, and set to it to no-op for the recursive call.

A test is added.

• Have you provided a meaningful PR description?
• Have you added a test, reproducer or referred to an issue with a reproducer?
• Have you tested your changes locally for CPU and GPU devices?
• Have you made sure that new changes do not introduce compiler warnings?
• If this PR is a work in progress, are you filing the PR as a draft?

[github-actions]

View rendered docs @ https://intelpython.github.io/dpctl/pulls/1103/index.html

[antonwolfy]

@oleksandr-pavlyk, thank you! LGTM!

[coveralls]

Coverage: 82.378%. Remained the same when pulling 3eed4e5 on hotfix/incorrect-mask-positions into e779c6a on master.

[github-actions]

Array API standard conformance tests for dpctl=0.14.1=py310h76be34b_3 ran successfully.
Passed: 36
Failed: 798
Skipped: 280

[github-actions]

Deleted rendered PR docs from intelpython.github.com/dpctl, latest should be updated shortly. 🤞

[github-actions]

Array API standard conformance tests for dpctl=0.14.1=py310h76be34b_3 ran successfully.
Passed: 36
Failed: 798
Skipped: 280