Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implementation of dpctl.tensor.not_equal function #1214

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jun 8, 2023

Conversation

vlad-perevezentsev
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR adds dpctl.tensor.not_equal function and tests for it

  • Have you provided a meaningful PR description?
  • Have you added a test, reproducer or referred to an issue with a reproducer?
  • Have you tested your changes locally for CPU and GPU devices?
  • Have you made sure that new changes do not introduce compiler warnings?
  • Have you checked performance impact of proposed changes?
  • If this PR is a work in progress, are you opening the PR as a draft?

@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

coveralls commented May 24, 2023

Coverage Status

coverage: 84.077% (+0.003%) from 84.074% when pulling cee2e0a on vlad-perevezentsev:not_equal_impl into 6bb09e7 on IntelPython:master.

@@ -261,7 +261,27 @@
# FIXME: implement U25

# B20: ==== NOT_EQUAL (x1, x2)
# FIXME: implement B20
_not_equal_docstring_ = """
not_equal(x1, x2, order='K')
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add out keyword, and describe it in Args section. Look at @vtavana PR for sin/exp for my changes to abs docstring.

@ndgrigorian ndgrigorian merged commit 69d420e into IntelPython:master Jun 8, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 8, 2023

Array API standard conformance tests for dpctl=0.14.3dev3=py310h7bf5fec_25 ran successfully.
Passed: 323
Failed: 677
Skipped: 119

@vlad-perevezentsev vlad-perevezentsev deleted the not_equal_impl branch June 20, 2023 10:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants