Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removed the incomplete vectorize decorator from numba-dpex #1298

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 29, 2024

Conversation

diptorupd
Copy link
Contributor

  • Have you provided a meaningful PR description?
    The vectorize decorator in numba-dpex has been broken for a while and needs a complete redesign to work with latest API changes. The PR removes the existing broken implementation and associated test cases. Once, we redesign the feature it will be implemented and merged.
  • Have you added a test, reproducer or referred to an issue with a reproducer?
  • Have you tested your changes locally for CPU and GPU devices?
  • Have you made sure that new changes do not introduce compiler warnings?
  • If this PR is a work in progress, are you filing the PR as a draft?

@diptorupd diptorupd requested a review from adarshyoga January 26, 2024 18:23
Copy link
Contributor

@adarshyoga adarshyoga left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@diptorupd
Copy link
Contributor Author

Merging the PR as the internal CI failure is due to an error in generating an interoperability kernel from SPIR-V on opencl:gpu devices.

@diptorupd diptorupd merged commit 57190e9 into main Jan 29, 2024
46 of 52 checks passed
@diptorupd diptorupd deleted the remove/vectorize branch January 29, 2024 20:12
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 29, 2024
Removed the incomplete vectorize decorator from numba-dpex 57190e9
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants