Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Import Entry using WebSearch not working and many other issues with Jabref 5.0 #6183

Closed
lwwini opened this issue Mar 26, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

Import Entry using WebSearch not working and many other issues with Jabref 5.0 #6183

lwwini opened this issue Mar 26, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels
status: stale Issues marked by a bot as "stale". All issues need to be investigated manually. status: waiting-for-feedback The submitter or other users need to provide more information about the issue

Comments

@lwwini
Copy link

lwwini commented Mar 26, 2020

Hi,

As the title suggested, WebSearch in Jabref 5.0 is not working, and it can't seem to be able to open my existing .bib document which was fine before the update. In addition, .bib files downloads straight from the publication website cannot be opened in Jabref 5.0.

Would be great if anyone could resolve these.

Thanks.
@lwwini
Copy link
Author

lwwini commented Mar 26, 2020

There is an error saying 'Error opening .bib file, file not found.' But then it can still present the file and everything is there....

@Siedlerchr
Copy link
Member

Hi, could you please add some more details, e.g. what steps you did or a sample bib file?
If a double click on the bib does not open JabRef, you can always Import files from the menu

@Siedlerchr Siedlerchr added the status: waiting-for-feedback The submitter or other users need to provide more information about the issue label Mar 26, 2020
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This issue will be closed in 7 days due to inactivity 💤 Please provide the requested information if the problem persists.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the status: stale Issues marked by a bot as "stale". All issues need to be investigated manually. label Apr 26, 2020
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as completed May 3, 2020
koppor pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 1, 2022
Squashed 'buildres/csl/csl-styles/' changes from c750b6e..8d69f16
c15cec8 
8d69f16 Create university-of-hull-harvard.csl (#6146)
139dfdd Create current organic synthesis.csl (#6139)
bb006c8 Update acta-universitatis-agriculturae-sueciae.csl (#6143)
5815da0 Create food-science-and-biotechnology.csl (#6132)
2702a7c Update harvard-university-for-the-creative-arts.csl (#6104)
ef34543 Update economic-geology.csl (#6128)
0adcd30 Bump mathieudutour/github-tag-action from 5.6 to 6.0 (#6141)
3c36e97 Create universite-du-quebec-a-montreal-prenoms.csl (#6073)
415bc05 Bump softprops/action-gh-release from 0.1.14 to 1 (#6142)
ae8c5e4 Create politique-europeenne.csl (#6074)
09cbc09 Update cell-numeric-superscript.csl (#6188)
6ee1ace Update avian-conservation-and-ecology.csl (#6191)
cb5c43f Update harvard-anglia-ruskin-university.csl (#6189)
5c4f4c0 Create anais-da-academia-brasileira-de-ciencias.csl (#6066)
a60dfe9 Update cardiff-university-harvard.csl (#6190)
999a45c Create sociologia-urbana-e-rurale.csl (#6042)
1bc9d62 Bluebook (#6183)
a4f2a72 Oxford Brookes (#6182)
88df8d5 Delete harvard-cardiff-university-old.csl (#6180)
b9302fd Update APA styles for "event" macro (#6174)
d4daec6 remove DOI for printed articles organizational-studies.csl (#6176)
acfc620 Create liver-transplantation.csl (#6167)
129a775 Change "event" to "event-title" (#6164)

git-subtree-dir: buildres/csl/csl-styles
git-subtree-split: 8d69f16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
status: stale Issues marked by a bot as "stale". All issues need to be investigated manually. status: waiting-for-feedback The submitter or other users need to provide more information about the issue
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@Siedlerchr @lwwini