Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix evaluate for mixtures over Intervals #352

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 15, 2024
Merged

Conversation

lbenet
Copy link
Member

@lbenet lbenet commented Mar 15, 2024

Fixes #351

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Mar 15, 2024

Coverage Status

coverage: 96.949% (-0.08%) from 97.025%
when pulling d517498 on lb/mixtures_intervals
into b9303b5 on master.

@schillic
Copy link
Contributor

Is it clear why this was not a problem before? Just checking... :)

@lbenet
Copy link
Member Author

lbenet commented Mar 15, 2024

Is it clear why this was not a problem before? Just checking... :)

I'm not quite sure. Among the "improvements" 😄 in TS we introduced specialized methods for Taylor1{TaylorN{T}}, and also moved IntervalArithmetic as an external dependency...

@lbenet
Copy link
Member Author

lbenet commented Mar 15, 2024

I'll merge and bump a new patch version; locally, tests related to JuliaReach/ReachabilityAnalysis.jl#808 pass...

@lbenet lbenet merged commit ee8a685 into master Mar 15, 2024
12 of 13 checks passed
@lbenet lbenet deleted the lb/mixtures_intervals branch March 27, 2024 18:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Wrong method of evaluate
3 participants