Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Include ITF1788 files and rewrite to use function of form sin(x::BigFloat, RoundUp) #78

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Nov 2, 2015
Merged

Include ITF1788 files and rewrite to use function of form sin(x::BigFloat, RoundUp) #78

merged 16 commits into from
Nov 2, 2015

Conversation

dpsanders
Copy link
Member

Miscellaneous changes.

@dpsanders
Update CRlibm requirement to 0.2.1
5f1bbf6 
0.2 on for BigFloat functions. (Will hopefully be included in Base in the future.)
This was referenced Nov 2, 2015
Closed
Closed
Closed
@dpsanders dpsanders changed the title Rewrite to use functions of form sin(x::BigFloat, RoundDown). Include ITF1788 files and rewrite to use function of form sin(x::BigFloat, RoundUp) Nov 2, 2015
@lbenet
Copy link
Member

lbenet commented Nov 2, 2015

I think this is ready to be merged. Shall I go ahead?

@dpsanders
Copy link
Member Author

I think so, yes!

@lbenet
Copy link
Member

lbenet commented Nov 2, 2015

Great work! This is really getting somewhere! Merging...

lbenet added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2015
@lbenet
Merge pull request #78 from dpsanders/itf1788_and_crlibm
04262e8 
Include ITF1788 files and rewrite to use function of form `sin(x::BigFloat, RoundUp)`
@lbenet lbenet merged commit 04262e8 into master Nov 2, 2015
@lbenet lbenet deleted the itf1788_and_crlibm branch November 2, 2015 15:09
@dpsanders dpsanders mentioned this pull request Nov 2, 2015
Closed
This was referenced Nov 2, 2015
Closed
Closed
@PallHaraldsson
Copy link

I'm not sure, is info here outdated? :

https://github.com/oheim/ITF1788/blob/master/README.md

@dpsanders
Copy link
Member Author

Not yet outdated, no, there's still quite some work to do before the package is compliant with the standard (unfortunately!).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@dpsanders @lbenet @PallHaraldsson