-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Do not merge] Test LBT forwards for MKL #39685
Conversation
All the linalg tests pass for me locally with MKL, with the exception of one matmul test, which is off by 1e-15. |
|
And the difference between the expected and the computed in the failing test:
|
ee8ed86
to
ad896d4
Compare
@staticfloat Do you know why tester_linux64 is not running? This PR tests literally every platform except for the one we really want! :-) |
just a long queue. It's running now. |
All BLAS and LAPACK are now routed through LBT. SuiteSparse is also linked against LBT. OpenBLAS is still installed as before, and is what LBT forwards to by default. Co-authored-by: Simon Byrne <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Kristoffer Carlsson <[email protected]>
aa2a5ce
to
8ee99b6
Compare
Linux64 has passed the tests fully, and the others only have small issues. I feel that LBT + MKL work reasonably well as a result and closing this PR. |
Out of curiosity, on master it is not yet possible to easily switch to MKL (based on MKL_jll), right? |
There's a PR up on MKL.jl with instructions. |
This branch is solely for the purpose of triggering CI to see if LBT works fine with MKL. The purpose is to be confident that LBT works as intended.