Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

3.0 minor fixes and improvements #243

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Sep 29, 2024
Merged

Conversation

gkronber
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 10, 2024

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 87.59430% with 148 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Please upload report for BASE (ale/3.0@8e95e4a). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/EGraphs/Schedulers.jl 43.47% 26 Missing ⚠️
src/utils.jl 7.69% 24 Missing ⚠️
src/EGraphs/egraph.jl 89.63% 23 Missing ⚠️
src/Syntax.jl 89.33% 16 Missing ⚠️
src/Patterns.jl 74.46% 12 Missing ⚠️
src/EGraphs/saturation.jl 95.20% 7 Missing ⚠️
src/Rules.jl 83.33% 7 Missing ⚠️
ext/Plotting.jl 0.00% 6 Missing ⚠️
src/Rewriters.jl 53.84% 6 Missing ⚠️
src/ematch_compiler.jl 95.83% 6 Missing ⚠️
... and 6 more

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             ale/3.0     #243   +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage           ?   81.17%           
==========================================
  Files              ?       19           
  Lines              ?     1503           
  Branches           ?        0           
==========================================
  Hits               ?     1220           
  Misses             ?      283           
  Partials           ?        0           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 10, 2024

Benchmark Results

egg-sym egg-cust MT@3373cb64951... MT@0b2e6c9f11b... egg-sym/MT@337... egg-cust/MT@33... MT@0b2e6c9f11b...
egraph_addexpr 1.46 ms 5 ms 4.99 ms 0.292 0.999
basic_maths_simpl2 13.6 ms 4.95 ms 19.9 ms 20.7 ms 0.682 0.248 1.04
prop_logic_freges_theorem 2.53 ms 1.55 ms 1.06 ms 1.07 ms 2.38 1.46 1.01
calc_logic_demorgan 60.9 μs 35.8 μs 77.4 μs 77.4 μs 0.786 0.463 0.999
calc_logic_freges_theorem 21.9 ms 12.3 ms 42 ms 42.6 ms 0.521 0.292 1.02
basic_maths_simpl1 6.36 ms 2.8 ms 4.68 ms 4.77 ms 1.36 0.599 1.02
egraph_constructor 0.0826 μs 0.0916 μs 0.0923 μs 0.902 1.01
prop_logic_prove1 35.3 ms 13.3 ms 42.1 ms 43 ms 0.839 0.316 1.02
prop_logic_demorgan 80.1 μs 45.6 μs 95.5 μs 98.2 μs 0.839 0.478 1.03
while_superinterpreter_while_10 18.5 ms 18.7 ms 1.01
prop_logic_rewrite 120 μs 121 μs 1.01
time_to_load 507 ms 502 ms 0.99

Benchmark Plots

A plot of the benchmark results have been uploaded as an artifact to the workflow run for this PR.
Go to "Actions"->"Benchmark a pull request"->[the most recent run]->"Artifacts" (at the bottom).

src/utils.jl Show resolved Hide resolved
@0x0f0f0f
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@0x0f0f0f
Copy link
Member

@gkronber you can mark as ready i guess

@gkronber
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I'll leave this open for a few more days for a few more smaller changes

@gkronber gkronber marked this pull request as ready for review September 24, 2024 07:17
@gkronber
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@0x0f0f0f should I merge back to ale/3.0, or do you prefer to continue to be responsible for merges?

@0x0f0f0f
Copy link
Member

@0x0f0f0f should I merge back to ale/3.0, or do you prefer to continue to be responsible for merges?

@gkronber i prefer still having a final look at the PRs if possible :)

@0x0f0f0f 0x0f0f0f merged commit 081a9e6 into ale/3.0 Sep 29, 2024
4 checks passed
@gkronber gkronber deleted the 3.0_minor_fixes_and_improvements branch October 5, 2024 08:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants