You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have a small issue with respect to the new DataFrame feature that you implemented. Here I have misaligned diagonals where I would get close to stochastic dominance of a model compared to itself.
Reproduce Issue
I have the following dictionary: d = {'x': array([59.13, 58.03, 59.18, 58.78, 58.5 ]), 'y': array([58.13, 59.19, 59.94, 60.08, 59.85]), 'z': array([58.77, 58.86, 59.58, 59.59, 59.64]), 'w': array([58.16, 58.49, 59.87, 58.94, 58.96])}
I use the following line of code: print(multi_aso(d, confidence_level=0.05, return_df=True))
I get the following result:
x y z w
x 1.000000 1.000000 0.202027 0.0
y 1.000000 0.101093 0.000000 0.0
z 0.202027 0.000000 1.000000 0.0
w 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 1.0
Where I think the diagonal for the (y, y) pair shouldn't be correct.
Thanks for reading!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
…a issue #7 (see below)
* Fix bug where symmetry property wouldn't be used to correctly to fill eps_min matrix
* Fix bug where indices would be misaligned, filling the wrong matrix entries with scores
* Add Mike's example from issue #7 as explicit test cases
Hi,
Love this repo, thanks for doing this!
Issue
I have a small issue with respect to the new DataFrame feature that you implemented. Here I have misaligned diagonals where I would get close to stochastic dominance of a model compared to itself.
Reproduce Issue
I have the following dictionary:
d = {'x': array([59.13, 58.03, 59.18, 58.78, 58.5 ]), 'y': array([58.13, 59.19, 59.94, 60.08, 59.85]), 'z': array([58.77, 58.86, 59.58, 59.59, 59.64]), 'w': array([58.16, 58.49, 59.87, 58.94, 58.96])}
I use the following line of code:
print(multi_aso(d, confidence_level=0.05, return_df=True))
I get the following result:
Where I think the diagonal for the (y, y) pair shouldn't be correct.
Thanks for reading!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: