Fix suggestion for updating function decl syntax for anon functions #5088
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
QA Wolf here! As you write new code it's important that your test coverage is keeping up. |
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
Signed-off-by: Nick Cameron <[email protected]>
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #5088 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 86.09% 86.09%
=======================================
Files 89 89
Lines 32389 32399 +10
=======================================
+ Hits 27884 27894 +10
Misses 4505 4505
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This addresses part 3 of #5081 by adding a separate suggestion for inserting the missing
fn, this is not perfect, ideally it would be one suggestion, but that would be a fair bit more work.