Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[QAA] Refactoring layout class #8941

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Open

[QAA] Refactoring layout class #8941

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

VicAlbr
Copy link
Contributor

@VicAlbr VicAlbr commented Jan 17, 2025

βœ… Checklist

  • npx changeset was attached.
  • Covered by automatic tests.
  • Impact of the changes:
    • ...

πŸ“ Description

Refacto layout class:

  • Keeping only side bar & top bar elements

❓ Context


🧐 Checklist for the PR Reviewers

  • The code aligns with the requirements described in the linked JIRA or GitHub issue.
  • The PR description clearly documents the changes made and explains any technical trade-offs or design decisions.
  • There are no undocumented trade-offs, technical debt, or maintainability issues.
  • The PR has been tested thoroughly, and any potential edge cases have been considered and handled.
  • Any new dependencies have been justified and documented.
  • Performance considerations have been taken into account. (changes have been profiled or benchmarked if necessary)

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 17, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git β†—οΈŽ

4 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
ledger-live-github-bot ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jan 17, 2025 3:31pm
native-ui-storybook ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jan 17, 2025 3:31pm
react-ui-storybook ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jan 17, 2025 3:31pm
web-tools ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jan 17, 2025 3:31pm

@live-github-bot live-github-bot bot added the desktop Has changes in LLD label Jan 17, 2025
@VicAlbr VicAlbr marked this pull request as ready for review January 17, 2025 15:11
@VicAlbr VicAlbr requested review from a team as code owners January 17, 2025 15:11
@@ -15,4 +18,14 @@ export class LockscreenPage extends AppPage {
async lostPassword() {
await this.forgottenButton.click();
}

@step("Check input error state visibibility: $0")
async checkInputErrorVisibibility(expectedState: "visible" | "hidden") {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

typo in method name

@@ -133,4 +137,37 @@ export class SendModal extends Modal {
await this.cryptoAmountField.fill(amount);
}
}

@step("Check input error state visibibility: $0")
async checkInputErrorVisibibility(expectedState: "visible" | "hidden") {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

typo

}

@step("Check warning message")
async checkAmoutWarningMessage(expectedWarningMessage: RegExp) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

typo


@step("Wait for balance to be visible")
async expectBalanceVisibility() {
await this.totalBalance.waitFor({ state: "visible" });
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see that we also have in the account.page an element with the same test id "total-balance" defined. It would be better if we can disassociate both (maybe in another ticket)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
desktop Has changes in LLD
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants