[MAINT] Support Windows' paths; Update zenodo & contributor count

[notZaki]

Closes None.

Few small changes:

• Use platform-specific path when comparing output files in integration tests
  • This was causing tests on Windows to fails because it expects paths\like\this instead of /like/that
• Updated the number of contributors on the readme badge
  • There is a configuration option which might automatically do this
  • Looks like there is a mismatch in the number of total contributors between all-contributors and github's contributor list. I went with number of all-contributors.
• Added myself to .zenodo.json
  • Should this follow the order in the planned JOSS paper? That might be better for consistency, but that means getting rid of The tedana Community and bit of shuffling
  • There is also info/__credits__ which is out of sync and could be removed to simplify maintenance

The full test suite passed on windows, mac, and ubuntu with Python 3.7-3.9 [log]

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #672 (bede0c2) into main (14be852) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #672   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.64%   93.64%           
=======================================
  Files          26       26           
  Lines        2030     2030           
=======================================
  Hits         1901     1901           
  Misses        129      129           

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 14be852...bede0c2. Read the comment docs.

[jbteves]

Thanks @notZaki !
It's weird that the patch has that one line both added and subtracted with no apparent change, but I'll go ahead and approve.

[jbteves]

The reason for the split is that in "all contributors" we add non-code, non-authored contributions. The GitHub contributors will only list people who have committed or co-authored something added to the main branch. So, "all contributors" is the correct listing for the total number of contributors.

I have no strong feelings about the Zenodo ordering.

[emdupre]

Thanks again, @notZaki ! 😄

re Windows : Thank you ! 🙏 We should probably add Azure testing....

re configuration : nice find ! I want to add "sort alphabetically," too. I'll see if I can get that changed. Don't worry about it in this PR.

re mismatch : @jbteves 's explanation matches my understanding :)

re: the zenodo : let's keep this as-is. The decision was that the software would always have the tedana community as first-author, but that individual outputs (like papers) could have different authorship orders / lists depending on who took on the writing, experiments, etc.

re __credits__ : good catch ! I'm in favor of removing it.

[emdupre]

I'm going to approve and merge this now so it goes into the release (:tada: ) and we can open another issue to remove __credits__ and set the all-contributors bot config.

🚀 🚀 🚀