Use a singleton for COMLibrary to fix issue #139
#143
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks a lot, Matthias. Your help is, as always, really appreciated! |
grtcdr
approved these changes
Mar 17, 2023
|
Glad I can help :) |
Carterpersall
added a commit
to Carterpersall/libmacchina
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 18, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The
COMLibrarycan not be created more than once (see ohadravid/wmi-rs#37).Therefore, let's store the resulting
WMIConnectionas a singleton which would also improve performance, since the WMI connection needs to be created only once.Additionally, I bumped the version of the
wmicrate.