SINGLENOZZLE: EXTRUDERS versus HOTENDS #3895
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Background: With
SINGLENOZZLE
(and perhaps future features) we need to separate the number ofEXTRUDERS
from the number of heaters-fan-thermistor combos, akaHOTENDS
. Currently theSINGLENOZZLE
implementation is incomplete, because it won't handle the temperature aspects correctly.Solution: This PR follows up the previous
SINGLENOZZLE
feature PR, taking into account that only one heater-fan-thermistor combo exists for the multi-extruder. Where needed, theEXTRUDERS
count is replaced with aHOTENDS
count. When usingSINGLENOZZLE
theHOTENDS
count will always be 1. Otherwise it will be equal toEXTRUDERS
.EXTRUDER_OFFSET_[XY]
toHOTEND_OFFSET_[XY]
EXTRUDER_WATTS
toHOTEND_WATTS
PID_PARAMS_PER_EXTRUDER
toPID_PARAMS_PER_HOTEND
extruder_offset
tohotend_offset
SINGLENOZZLE
(ignore the extruder index)References: