This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 13, 2023. It is now read-only.
feat: Sentry Integration #602
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
silasary
added
Improvement
AstreaTSS
reviewed
Aug 16, 2022
LordOfPolls
suggested changes
Aug 18, 2022
|
Docs could be improved, but i'm happy to merge (changes pending) without their improvement as theyre succinct enough |
LordOfPolls
approved these changes
Aug 22, 2022
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What type of pull request is this?
Description
Adds an extension that sets up Sentry.io hooks
Finally Closes #403
Changes
Adds extension.
Adds (really bad) documentation. Polls, please
rewriteimprove it.Checklist
Python 3.10.x