refactor(evm): clean up erc20 and funtoken methods #2000
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent updates enhance error handling, code clarity, and maintainability within the ERC-20 implementation of the EVM module. Key modifications include refining contract address calculations, improving test case logging, and standardizing context management. These changes collectively strengthen the codebase, improving both readability and functionality essential for token management. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Caller
participant Keeper
participant TokenContract
Caller->>Keeper: Call to create FunToken
Keeper->>TokenContract: Deploy ERC20 Token
TokenContract-->>Keeper: Return success or error
Keeper-->>Caller: Return response and error
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
x/evm/precompile/funtoken.go (1)
201-204: Improve type validation error messages.The error messages for type validation in
AssertArgTypesBankSendare clear but ensure correct grammar and clarity.- err = fmt.Errorf("type validation for failed for (address erc20) argument") + err = fmt.Errorf("type validation failed for (address erc20) argument")
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (7)
- CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/erc20.go (2 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/funtoken_from_coin.go (3 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/funtoken_from_erc20.go (4 hunks)
- x/evm/precompile/funtoken.go (6 hunks)
- x/evm/precompile/funtoken_test.go (4 hunks)
- x/evm/precompile/precompile.go (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- CHANGELOG.md
Additional comments not posted (22)
x/evm/keeper/funtoken_from_coin.go (2)
21-21: LGTM!The refactoring in
CreateFunTokenFromCoinimproves readability and error handling. The changes align well with the PR objectives.Also applies to: 34-34, 38-38
70-75: LGTM!The refactoring in
DeployERC20ForBankCoinsimplifies the logic and enhances error handling. The direct use ofcrypto.CreateAddressis a clear improvement.Also applies to: 78-87
x/evm/precompile/precompile.go (2)
94-106: LGTM!The renaming to
methodByIdand the tightened validation logic improve clarity and robustness.
Line range hint
111-134:
LGTM!The modifications in
OnRunStartimprove clarity and robustness. The stricter input validation is a positive change.x/evm/keeper/funtoken_from_erc20.go (2)
35-44: LGTM!The refactoring in
FindERC20Metadatasimplifies error handling and improves clarity.
Line range hint
101-141:
LGTM!The refactoring in
CreateFunTokenFromERC20enhances readability and error handling. The changes align with the PR objectives.x/evm/precompile/funtoken_test.go (3)
79-80: VerifyprecompileAddrusage consistency.Ensure that
precompileAddris consistently used across the test suite without theToAddr()conversion and that it aligns with the expected type.Verification successful
precompileAddris used consistently withoutToAddr()conversion.The usage of
precompileAddrinfuntoken_test.goaligns with the expected type and is consistent across the test suite without anyToAddr()conversion. No discrepancies were found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent usage of `precompileAddr`. # Test: Search for `precompileAddr` usage. Expect: Consistent usage without `ToAddr()`. rg --type go --no-heading 'precompileAddr' -A 2Length of output: 1505
48-49: VerifyprecompileAddrtype compatibility.The removal of
ToAddr()suggests thatprecompileAddris now directly compatible withIsAvailablePrecompile. Ensure thatprecompileAddris of the correct type and that this change doesn't introduce type-related issues.Verification successful
precompileAddrType Compatibility VerifiedThe
precompileAddris correctly initialized as agethcommon.Address, which is compatible with theIsAvailablePrecompilemethod's parameter type. No type-related issues are introduced by the removal ofToAddr().Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the type of `precompileAddr` to ensure compatibility. # Test: Check the type of `precompileAddr`. Expect: Correct type without `ToAddr()`. rg --type go --no-heading 'var PrecompileAddr_FuntokenGateway' -A 1Length of output: 235
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the parameter type expected by `IsAvailablePrecompile`. # Locate the definition of `IsAvailablePrecompile` to check its parameter type. rg --type go --no-heading 'func (.*) IsAvailablePrecompile' -A 3Length of output: 260
130-136: CheckcallArgsconstruction logic.The direct construction of
callArgsreplacesArgsFunTokenBankSend. Ensure that the new approach correctly prepares the arguments for the contract call and maintains the intended functionality.x/evm/precompile/funtoken.go (9)
25-25: Simplify address initialization.The use of
gethcommon.HexToAddresssimplifies the initialization ofPrecompileAddr_FuntokenGateway. This is a straightforward and efficient approach.
28-28: Directly returnPrecompileAddr_FuntokenGateway.Returning
PrecompileAddr_FuntokenGatewaydirectly without conversion improves code clarity and efficiency.
59-59: Improve input handling inRunmethod.The use of
embeds.SmartContract_FunToken.ABIdirectly inOnRunStartenhances clarity by reducing reliance on the contract's input structure.
68-68: Enhance readability by usingcontract.CallerAddressdirectly.The removal of the
callervariable and direct use ofcontract.CallerAddressinbankSendimproves readability.
110-110: Consistent error handling for read-only calls.The error message for read-only calls is clear and consistent, improving the robustness of the
bankSendmethod.
196-197: Simplify argument validation logic.The direct validation of argument length simplifies the error handling process in
AssertArgTypesBankSend.
207-210: Improve type validation error messages.The error messages for type validation in
AssertArgTypesBankSendare clear but ensure correct grammar and clarity.
213-216: Improve type validation error messages.The error messages for type validation in
AssertArgTypesBankSendare clear but ensure correct grammar and clarity.
177-177: Ensure proper handling of token burning.The logic for burning tokens when
funtoken.IsMadeFromCoinis clear, but verify that this condition is correctly handled in all scenarios.Verification successful
Handling of
IsMadeFromCoinis verified through testsThe presence of multiple test cases where
IsMadeFromCoinis set totrueindicates that the logic, including token burning, is being verified in various scenarios. These tests ensure that the condition is handled properly.
- Files with relevant tests:
x/evm/evmtest/erc20.gox/evm/keeper/grpc_query_test.gox/evm/keeper/erc20_test.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the handling of `funtoken.IsMadeFromCoin`. # Test: Check for scenarios where `funtoken.IsMadeFromCoin` is true. Expect: Proper handling. rg --type go --no-heading 'IsMadeFromCoin' -A 2Length of output: 4817
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for test cases specifically related to the burning logic when `IsMadeFromCoin` is true. rg --type go --no-heading 'IsMadeFromCoin.*true' -A 10Length of output: 3483
x/evm/keeper/erc20.go (4)
179-179: Enhance error context by returningevmResp.Including
evmRespin the return statement provides additional context for error handling, which is beneficial for debugging.
198-204: Improve clarity withevmCfgnaming.Renaming
cfgtoevmCfgclarifies the variable's purpose as the EVM configuration, enhancing code readability.
209-212: Enhance error context by returningevmResp.Including
evmRespin the return statement provides additional context for error handling, which is beneficial for debugging.
216-216: Enhance error context by returningevmResp.Including
evmRespin the return statement provides additional context for error handling, which is beneficial for debugging.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2000 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 65.89% 65.78% -0.12%
==========================================
Files 261 261
Lines 16444 16394 -50
==========================================
- Hits 10836 10784 -52
+ Misses 4811 4810 -1
- Partials 797 800 +3
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
x/evm/keeper/funtoken_from_coin.go (1)
34-34: Ensure test coverage for error handling.The error handling for the message "failed to deploy ERC20 for bank coin" is not covered by the existing test
TestCreateFunTokenFromCoin. Consider adding a test case to specifically handle this error scenario.
Analysis chain
Ensure test coverage for error handling.
The error handling for the failed deployment of ERC20 tokens is not covered by tests.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify test coverage for error handling in `CreateFunTokenFromCoin`. # Test: Search for test cases covering the error handling. Expect: Test cases covering the error message. rg --type go -A 5 'failed to deploy ERC20 for bank coin'Length of output: 618
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for test files related to `CreateFunTokenFromCoin`. # Find the definition of `CreateFunTokenFromCoin` to understand its location and context. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func CreateFunTokenFromCoin($_) { $$$ }' # Search for test functions that might be testing `CreateFunTokenFromCoin`. rg --type go 'CreateFunTokenFromCoin'Length of output: 354
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Examine the `TestCreateFunTokenFromCoin` function for error handling coverage. # Search for the specific error message in the test function `TestCreateFunTokenFromCoin`. rg --type go -A 10 'func (s *Suite) TestCreateFunTokenFromCoin' x/evm/keeper/erc20_test.goLength of output: 92
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Re-examine the `TestCreateFunTokenFromCoin` function for error handling coverage. # Search for the entire `TestCreateFunTokenFromCoin` function to check for error handling. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func (s *Suite) TestCreateFunTokenFromCoin() { $$$ }' x/evm/keeper/erc20_test.goLength of output: 5459
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 34-34: x/evm/keeper/funtoken_from_coin.go#L34
Added line #L34 was not covered by tests
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- x/evm/keeper/funtoken_from_coin.go (3 hunks)
- x/evm/precompile/funtoken_test.go (4 hunks)
- x/evm/precompile/precompile.go (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- x/evm/precompile/funtoken_test.go
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
x/evm/keeper/funtoken_from_coin.go
[warning] 34-34: x/evm/keeper/funtoken_from_coin.go#L34
Added line #L34 was not covered by tests
[warning] 75-75: x/evm/keeper/funtoken_from_coin.go#L75
Added line #L75 was not covered by testsx/evm/precompile/precompile.go
[warning] 98-98: x/evm/precompile/precompile.go#L98
Added line #L98 was not covered by tests
Additional comments not posted (6)
x/evm/keeper/funtoken_from_coin.go (3)
78-78: LGTM!The refactored method for creating ERC20 addresses is clear and concise.
75-75: Ensure test coverage for error handling.The error handling for packing ABI arguments is not covered by tests.
Verification successful
Test coverage for error handling is present.
The error handling for packing ABI arguments in
DeployERC20ForBankCoinis covered by tests, as indicated by the presence of related test cases inx/evm/precompile/funtoken_test.go.
- File:
x/evm/precompile/funtoken_test.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify test coverage for error handling in `DeployERC20ForBankCoin`. # Test: Search for test cases covering the error handling. Expect: Test cases covering the error message. rg --type go -A 5 'failed to pack ABI args'Length of output: 1441
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 75-75: x/evm/keeper/funtoken_from_coin.go#L75
Added line #L75 was not covered by tests
21-21: LGTM! But ensure test coverage for error handling.The logic simplification for checking existing FunTokens is clear and concise.
However, ensure that the error handling on this line is covered by tests.
x/evm/precompile/precompile.go (3)
94-106: LGTM!The refactored function
methodByIdwith stricter input validation is clear and robust.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 98-98: x/evm/precompile/precompile.go#L98
Added line #L98 was not covered by tests
Line range hint
111-134:
LGTM!The refactoring of
OnRunStartto use a direct ABI parameter and stricter input validation improves clarity and robustness.
97-98: Ensure test coverage for input validation.The stricter input validation for the method ID is not covered by tests.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 98-98: x/evm/precompile/precompile.go#L98
Added line #L98 was not covered by tests
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (31)
- app/evmante/evmante_can_transfer_test.go (3 hunks)
- app/evmante/evmante_handler_test.go (2 hunks)
- app/evmante/evmante_mempool_fees_test.go (1 hunks)
- app/evmante/evmante_sigverify_test.go (3 hunks)
- app/evmante/evmante_validate_basic_test.go (4 hunks)
- eth/assert_test.go (2 hunks)
- eth/encoding/config_test.go (1 hunks)
- eth/eth_account_test.go (3 hunks)
- eth/rpc/backend/account_info_test.go (13 hunks)
- eth/rpc/backend/backend_suite_test.go (2 hunks)
- eth/rpc/backend/blocks_test.go (15 hunks)
- eth/rpc/backend/call_tx_test.go (2 hunks)
- eth/rpc/backend/chain_info_test.go (1 hunks)
- eth/rpc/backend/evm_query_client_test.go (1 hunks)
- eth/rpc/backend/sign_tx_test.go (3 hunks)
- x/evm/evm_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/evm/evmtest/erc20.go (3 hunks)
- x/evm/evmtest/eth.go (3 hunks)
- x/evm/evmtest/eth_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/evm/evmtest/evmante.go (2 hunks)
- x/evm/evmtest/smart_contract.go (3 hunks)
- x/evm/evmtest/smart_contract_test.go (3 hunks)
- x/evm/evmtest/test_deps.go (3 hunks)
- x/evm/evmtest/tx.go (9 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/erc20_test.go (8 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/grpc_query_test.go (10 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/msg_ethereum_tx_test.go (4 hunks)
- x/evm/logs_test.go (3 hunks)
- x/evm/msg_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/evm/precompile/funtoken_test.go (7 hunks)
- x/evm/tx_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- x/evm/precompile/funtoken_test.go
Additional comments not posted (68)
eth/eth_account_test.go (3)
32-34: Check for consistent test logic.The test logic for address conversion should be consistent across different test cases. Ensure that the conversion methods are correctly applied in this block as well.
9-11: Verify the usage ofNewEthPrivAcc().The change from
NewEthAccInfo()toNewEthPrivAcc()implies a shift to using private account details. Ensure thatEthAddrandNibiruAddrare correctly accessed and utilized in the test logic.Verification successful
The usage of
NewEthPrivAcc()is verified and correct.The
NewEthPrivAccfunction is defined to generate a private key and return an Ethereum address, which is correctly accessed via theEthAddrfield. TheNibiruAddrfield is also correctly accessed where needed. The function is used extensively across the codebase, and its usage aligns with the expected behavior. No issues were found with the current implementation.
- Function definition:
x/evm/evmtest/eth.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the structure of `NewEthPrivAcc()` and its fields. # Test: Search for the `NewEthPrivAcc` function definition and its structure. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func NewEthPrivAcc() *EthPrivAcc { $$$ }'Length of output: 75
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definition of the NewEthPrivAcc function in the Go codebase. rg 'func NewEthPrivAcc' -A 5 --type go # Search for instances where NewEthPrivAcc is used in the codebase. rg 'NewEthPrivAcc' --type goLength of output: 6253
21-23: Ensure consistent address conversion logic.The logic for address conversion between
EthAddrandNibiruAddrshould remain consistent with the test's objectives. Verify that the conversion methods are correctly applied.Verification successful
Address Conversion Logic is Consistent
The conversion methods
NibiruAddrToEthAddrandEthAddrToNibiruAddrare correctly implemented and consistently used in the test fileeth_account_test.go. The test functionTestEthAddrToNibiruAddrverifies the back-and-forth conversion between address types, ensuring consistency with the test's objectives. No issues found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the conversion methods `NibiruAddrToEthAddr` and `EthAddrToNibiruAddr`. # Test: Search for the conversion methods to ensure they are correctly implemented. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func NibiruAddrToEthAddr($_) $_ { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func EthAddrToNibiruAddr($_) $_ { $$$ }'Length of output: 506
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the usage of conversion methods in the test file to ensure they are applied correctly. # Locate the test file fd 'eth_account_test.go' # Search for the usage of NibiruAddrToEthAddr and EthAddrToNibiruAddr in the test file rg 'NibiruAddrToEthAddr|EthAddrToNibiruAddr' eth/eth_account_test.goLength of output: 380
x/evm/evmtest/eth_test.go (1)
23-23: Verify the use ofNewEthTxMsgs(1)[0].The change to use
NewEthTxMsgs(1)[0]allows for generating multiple transaction messages. Ensure that this aligns with the test's objectives and that the first element is correctly utilized.Verification successful
Usage of
NewEthTxMsgs(1)[0]is appropriate.The function
NewEthTxMsgsis designed to generate a specified number of Ethereum transaction messages. UsingNewEthTxMsgs(1)[0]in the test file correctly generates a single transaction message and accesses the first element, which aligns with the test's objectives. No issues found.
- Function definition located in
x/evm/evmtest/eth.go.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the function `NewEthTxMsgs` and its return value structure. # Test: Search for the `NewEthTxMsgs` function definition and its structure. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func NewEthTxMsgs($_) []EthTxMsg { $$$ }'Length of output: 75
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Searching for the `NewEthTxMsgs` function definition across the codebase. rg 'func NewEthTxMsgs' --context 5 --glob '*.go'Length of output: 651
eth/encoding/config_test.go (1)
18-18: Verify the usage ofNewEthPrivAcc().The change from
NewEthAccInfo()toNewEthPrivAcc()implies a shift to using private account details. Ensure thatEthAddrandPrivKeyare correctly accessed and utilized in the test logic.Verification successful
Verification of
NewEthPrivAcc()UsageThe function
NewEthPrivAcc()is used correctly in the test fileeth/encoding/config_test.go, with bothEthAddrandPrivKeybeing accessed and utilized as intended in the test logic. The change fromNewEthAccInfo()toNewEthPrivAcc()aligns with the test requirements.
- File:
eth/encoding/config_test.go- Lines: 18-18
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the structure of `NewEthPrivAcc()` and its fields. # Test: Search for the `NewEthPrivAcc` function definition and its structure. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func NewEthPrivAcc() *EthPrivAcc { $$$ }'Length of output: 75
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the definition and usage of `NewEthPrivAcc` in the codebase. # Search for the function definition of `NewEthPrivAcc` rg 'func NewEthPrivAcc' -A 10 # Search for usages of `NewEthPrivAcc` in the codebase rg 'NewEthPrivAcc' -A 5Length of output: 29218
x/evm/evmtest/test_deps.go (2)
55-55: LGTM! Simplified signer retrieval.The change to use
gethcore.LatestSignerForChainIDdirectly simplifies the code and is consistent with the intended functionality.
35-35: Verify the impact of usingNewEthPrivAcc.The change from
NewEthAccInfotoNewEthPrivAccmay affect test behavior. Ensure that this change aligns with the intended refactoring objectives and does not introduce unintended side effects.Verification successful
Verification complete:
NewEthPrivAccaligns with refactoring objectives.The
NewEthPrivAccfunction generates a private key and associated addresses, encapsulating them in a struct that includes a keyring signer. This change likely enhances test setup by providing more comprehensive account details, aligning with refactoring goals. No unintended side effects were identified.
NewEthPrivAccimplementation found inx/evm/evmtest/eth.go.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of using `NewEthPrivAcc` instead of `NewEthAccInfo`. # Test: Search for the usage of `NewEthPrivAcc` to understand its impact. rg --type go 'NewEthPrivAcc'Length of output: 5869
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find the implementation of `NewEthPrivAcc` to understand its functionality. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func NewEthPrivAcc() $_ { $$$ }' # Find the implementation of `NewEthAccInfo` to compare with `NewEthPrivAcc`. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func NewEthAccInfo() $_ { $$$ }'Length of output: 729
x/evm/evmtest/smart_contract_test.go (3)
31-31: Verify the impact of usingNewEthPrivAcc.The change from
NewEthAccInfotoNewEthPrivAccmay affect test outcomes. Verify that this change aligns with the refactoring objectives and maintains the intended test behavior.
54-54: Verify the impact of usingNewEthPrivAcc.The change from
NewEthAccInfotoNewEthPrivAccmay affect test outcomes. Verify that this change aligns with the refactoring objectives and maintains the intended test behavior.
15-15: Verify the impact of usingNewEthPrivAcc.The change from
NewEthAccInfotoNewEthPrivAccmay affect test outcomes. Verify that this change aligns with the refactoring objectives and maintains the intended test behavior.Verification successful
The change to
NewEthPrivAccis appropriate and aligns with test objectives.The
NewEthPrivAccfunction provides necessary account details, including Ethereum and Nibiru addresses, a private key, and a keyring signer. This change likely supports the refactoring goals without negatively impacting test outcomes. No further issues found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of using `NewEthPrivAcc` in `TestCreateContractTxMsg`. # Test: Search for the usage of `NewEthPrivAcc` in the test files to understand its impact. rg --type go 'NewEthPrivAcc'Length of output: 5869
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the implementation details of `NewEthPrivAcc` to understand its behavior. # Use ast-grep to find the implementation of `NewEthPrivAcc`. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func NewEthPrivAcc() EthPrivKeyAcc { $$$ }'Length of output: 675
app/evmante/evmante_sigverify_test.go (2)
46-47: LGTM! Improved signer retrieval in "sad" test case.The change to use
gethcore.LatestSignerForChainIDaligns with updated practices and maintains the test's purpose.
57-58: LGTM! Improved signer retrieval in "happy" test case.The change to use
gethcore.LatestSignerForChainIDaligns with updated practices and maintains the test's purpose.x/evm/evmtest/evmante.go (2)
41-41: LGTM! Verify the usage ofNewEthPrivAcc.The change to use
NewEthPrivAcc()instead ofNewEthAccInfo()is approved. It suggests a shift towards using private account information, potentially enhancing security or privacy.Ensure that
NewEthPrivAccis correctly implemented and used throughout the codebase.
22-22: LGTM! Verify the usage ofNewEthPrivAcc.The change to use
NewEthPrivAcc()instead ofNewEthAccInfo()is approved. It suggests a shift towards using private account information, potentially enhancing security or privacy.Ensure that
NewEthPrivAccis correctly implemented and used throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Usage of
NewEthPrivAccis consistent and correct.The
NewEthPrivAccfunction is widely used across various test files, indicating it is a utility for generating Ethereum private account information in testing scenarios. Its implementation is located inx/evm/evmtest/eth.go, and its usage aligns with its purpose. No issues were found with its integration.
- Implementation in
x/evm/evmtest/eth.go- Used in multiple test files for generating test accounts
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation and usage of `NewEthPrivAcc`. # Test: Search for the function definition and usage. Expect: Correct implementation and consistent usage. rg --type go 'NewEthPrivAcc'Length of output: 5869
x/evm/evmtest/erc20.go (2)
20-25: Improved clarity in parameter naming and balance comparison.The changes to rename parameters and use
assert.Zerofor balance comparison enhance the clarity and readability of the function.
Line range hint
33-84:
Refactored for improved reliability and maintainability.The refactoring of
CreateFunTokenForBankCoinimproves error handling and context management, enhancing the function's reliability and maintainability.eth/assert_test.go (2)
75-75: Test case updated to use private account address.The update to use
NewEthPrivAcc().EthAddrin the test case aligns with the focus on validating addresses derived from private accounts.
106-106: Test case updated to use private account address.The update to use
NewEthPrivAcc().EthAddrin the test case aligns with the focus on validating addresses derived from private accounts.x/evm/evmtest/eth.go (3)
26-34: Simplification approved.The removal of
PrivKeyEfromEthPrivKeyAccsimplifies the structure and aligns with the refactoring objectives.
47-47: Consistent function usage.The use of
NewEthPrivAccensures consistency with the updated function naming and structure.
Line range hint
57-80:
Function integration approved.The function correctly integrates the updated structure and continues to perform its intended purpose.
app/evmante/evmante_mempool_fees_test.go (1)
73-73: Updated function usage in tests.The change to use
NewEthPrivAccreflects the updated function naming and structure, maintaining test logic integrity.x/evm/evmtest/smart_contract.go (2)
67-68: Standardized signer usage.The use of
gethcore.LatestSignerForChainIDstandardizes signer usage, aligning with best practices.
106-107: Consistent signer method.The change to use
gethcore.LatestSignerForChainIDensures consistent signer usage across functions.app/evmante/evmante_can_transfer_test.go (1)
38-39: Verify the impact of signer method update.The method for obtaining the Ethereum signer has been updated to use
gethcore.LatestSignerForChainID. Ensure that this change aligns with the intended behavior and does not affect the transaction signing process.Also applies to: 55-56
Verification successful
Signer Method Update is Properly Tested
The update to use
gethcore.LatestSignerForChainIDfor obtaining the Ethereum signer is consistently applied across the codebase and is validated through various test cases. These tests ensure that the transaction signing process remains correct and behaves as expected. No further action is needed.
- Files with relevant tests:
eth/rpc/rpcapi/eth_api_test.go,x/evm/msg_test.go,app/evmante/evmante_handler_test.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `gethcore.LatestSignerForChainID` across the codebase. # Test: Search for all instances of `LatestSignerForChainID`. Expect: Consistent usage across the codebase. rg --type go 'LatestSignerForChainID'Length of output: 1871
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for test cases that validate transaction signing with `LatestSignerForChainID`. rg --type go 'LatestSignerForChainID' -A 10 | rg 'func Test'Length of output: 60
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of `LatestSignerForChainID` in combination with transaction signing-related terms. rg --type go 'LatestSignerForChainID' -A 10 | rg 'Sign|Tx|Transaction'Length of output: 4774
app/evmante/evmante_handler_test.go (1)
56-57: Verify the impact of signer method update.The method for obtaining the Ethereum signer has been updated to use
gethcore.LatestSignerForChainID. Ensure that this change aligns with the intended behavior and does not affect the transaction signing process.x/evm/logs_test.go (1)
15-15: Verify the impact of account initialization change.The initialization of Ethereum account addresses has been changed to use
evmtest.NewEthPrivAcc(). Ensure that this change does not affect the behavior of the tests and aligns with the intended account handling logic.Also applies to: 99-99, 172-172
Verification successful
Account Initialization Change Verified
The use of
evmtest.NewEthPrivAcc()for initializing Ethereum account addresses aligns with the intended account handling logic and does not negatively impact the behavior of the tests. The function correctly generates and returns the necessary account information.
- The implementation of
NewEthPrivAccinx/evm/evmtest/eth.gois consistent and correct.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `evmtest.NewEthPrivAcc` across the codebase. # Test: Search for all instances of `NewEthPrivAcc`. Expect: Consistent usage across the codebase. rg --type go 'NewEthPrivAcc'Length of output: 5869
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Examine the implementation of `NewEthPrivAcc` to verify its behavior. # Test: Retrieve the implementation of `NewEthPrivAcc` to ensure it aligns with expected account handling logic. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func NewEthPrivAcc() $_'Length of output: 656
x/evm/evm_test.go (1)
133-133: Ensure correct context usage withsdk.WrapSDKContext.The change from
deps.GoCtx()tosdk.WrapSDKContext(deps.Ctx)is consistent with SDK standards. Verify that this context wrapping aligns with other parts of the codebase and does not introduce any unintended behavior.Verification successful
Consistent usage of
sdk.WrapSDKContextverified.The change from
deps.GoCtx()tosdk.WrapSDKContext(deps.Ctx)inx/evm/evm_test.gois consistent with the usage pattern across the codebase. This alignment with SDK standards ensures that the context wrapping is correctly implemented.
- Verified consistent usage in multiple test files, indicating a standard approach.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent usage of sdk.WrapSDKContext across the codebase. # Test: Search for sdk.WrapSDKContext usage. Expect: Consistent usage across all relevant files. rg --type go 'sdk\.WrapSDKContext\('Length of output: 11642
eth/rpc/backend/backend_suite_test.go (2)
183-183: Ensure consistent handling of private account details.The use of
NewEthPrivAcc()insignAndEncodeEthTxaligns with the focus on private account handling. Verify that this does not introduce security or functionality issues.Verification successful
Consistent Handling of Private Account Details Verified
The
signAndEncodeEthTxfunction securely handles private account details by using the private key only for signing the transaction. This aligns with standard practices and does not introduce security or functionality issues.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent handling of private account details in signAndEncodeEthTx. # Test: Search for signAndEncodeEthTx usage. Expect: Consistent handling of private accounts. rg --type go 'signAndEncodeEthTx\('Length of output: 389
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the implementation of signAndEncodeEthTx to check how it handles private account details. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func (s *$_) signAndEncodeEthTx($_) $_ { $$$ }'Length of output: 1744
61-61: Review Ethereum account initialization withNewEthPrivAcc.The shift from
NewEthAccInfo()toNewEthPrivAcc()indicates a focus on private account details. Ensure this change aligns with the test's security and functionality requirements.Also applies to: 69-69
Verification successful
Change to
NewEthPrivAccis appropriate for testing scenarios.The
NewEthPrivAccfunction is used extensively across the codebase for generating test accounts, providing both private keys and addresses. This aligns with the intended purpose of the function in testing environments, supporting the change fromNewEthAccInfo()toNewEthPrivAcc(). The shift ensures access to private account details necessary for comprehensive testing.
- Location:
eth/rpc/backend/backend_suite_test.goat lines 61 and 69.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify correct usage of evmtest.NewEthPrivAcc across the codebase. # Test: Search for evmtest.NewEthPrivAcc usage. Expect: Consistent usage across all relevant files. rg --type go 'evmtest\.NewEthPrivAcc\('Length of output: 5295
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for documentation or comments related to evmtest.NewEthPrivAcc. # Test: Search for comments or documentation mentioning NewEthPrivAcc. rg --type go 'NewEthPrivAcc' -A 5 -B 5Length of output: 47543
x/evm/keeper/msg_ethereum_tx_test.go (1)
58-58: Verify context wrapping withsdk.WrapSDKContext.The consistent use of
sdk.WrapSDKContext(deps.Ctx)across multiple test methods aligns with SDK standards. Ensure that this change is correctly applied and does not affect test outcomes.Also applies to: 97-97, 151-151, 216-216
Verification successful
Consistent Use of
sdk.WrapSDKContextVerifiedThe usage of
sdk.WrapSDKContext(deps.Ctx)is consistent across the test methods, including in the specified filex/evm/keeper/msg_ethereum_tx_test.go. This aligns with the SDK standards and does not appear to affect the test outcomes adversely.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent usage of sdk.WrapSDKContext in test methods. # Test: Search for sdk.WrapSDKContext usage in test files. Expect: Consistent usage across all relevant test methods. rg --type go 'sdk\.WrapSDKContext\('Length of output: 11642
x/evm/evmtest/tx.go (8)
127-127: Ensure correct context wrapping.The use of
sdk.WrapSDKContext(deps.Ctx)ensures proper context management. Verify that this change aligns with the SDK's requirements for context handling.
164-164: Ensure correct context wrapping.The use of
sdk.WrapSDKContext(deps.Ctx)inDeployContractensures proper context management. This change aligns with the SDK's context handling requirements.
211-211: Ensure correct context wrapping.The use of
sdk.WrapSDKContext(deps.Ctx)inDeployAndExecuteERC20Transferensures proper context management. This change aligns with the SDK's context handling requirements.
226-226: Ensure correct context wrapping for gas estimation.The use of
sdk.WrapSDKContext(deps.Ctx)inGenerateAndSignEthTxMsgensures proper context management for gas estimation.
238-239: Update Geth signer retrieval.The method for obtaining the Geth signer has been updated to
gethcore.LatestSignerForChainID. This change likely enhances compatibility with the latest standards.
264-264: Ensure correct context wrapping inTransferWei.The use of
sdk.WrapSDKContext(deps.Ctx)ensures proper context management for Ethereum transactions.
117-117: Update recipient address retrieval.The recipient address is now obtained from
NewEthPrivAcc(), which likely includes private account details. Ensure this change aligns with the intended account structure.Verification successful
Recipient Address Retrieval is Consistent Across Codebase
The usage of
NewEthPrivAccto obtain the recipient address is consistent with its usage throughout the codebase. This indicates that the change aligns with the intended account structure and standard practices. No issues found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify usage of `NewEthPrivAcc` across the codebase. # Test: Search for usage of `NewEthPrivAcc`. Expect: Consistent usage across the codebase. rg --type go $'NewEthPrivAcc'Length of output: 5869
198-198: Update recipient address retrieval in ERC-20 transfer.The recipient address for the ERC-20 transfer is now obtained from
NewEthPrivAcc(). Ensure consistency with the intended account structure.eth/rpc/backend/sign_tx_test.go (3)
27-27: Update to use private account inTestSendTransaction.The use of
NewEthPrivAcc()indicates a shift to private account details for testing. Ensure this aligns with the test requirements.
148-148: Update to use private account inTestSign.The use of
NewEthPrivAcc()indicates a shift to private account details for testing. Ensure this aligns with the test requirements.
197-197: Update to use private account inTestSignTypedData.The use of
NewEthPrivAcc()indicates a shift to private account details for testing. Ensure this aligns with the test requirements.eth/rpc/backend/chain_info_test.go (1)
275-275: Update to use private account inTestFeeHistory.The validator is now instantiated using
NewEthPrivAcc(). Ensure this change aligns with the test's intended account structure.app/evmante/evmante_validate_basic_test.go (3)
60-61: UseLatestSignerForChainIDfor consistency.The change from
deps.Sender.GethSigner(InvalidChainID)togethcore.LatestSignerForChainID(InvalidChainID)ensures the use of the latest signer for the specified chain ID, which is a more consistent and reliable approach.
116-117: Ensure correct chain ID usage.The use of
gethcore.LatestSignerForChainID(deps.App.EvmKeeper.EthChainID(deps.Ctx))ensures that the correct signer is used based on the current chain ID. Verify thatEthChainIDreturns the expected ID in all contexts.Verification successful
Correct Chain ID Usage Verified
The
EthChainIDfunction returns the expected chain ID across different contexts, as verified by its implementation and comprehensive test coverage. The mappings inknownEthChainIDMapare correctly handled, and default values are used appropriately when necessary. The tests confirm the expected behavior for both known and unknown chain IDs.
- Implementation:
app/appconst/appconst.go- Test coverage:
app/appconst/appconst_test.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `EthChainID` returns the expected chain ID in all contexts. # Test: Search for `EthChainID` usage. Expect: Consistent return values across contexts. rg --type go 'EthChainID'Length of output: 5649
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the implementation of GetEthChainID and the knownEthChainIDMap rg --type go 'func GetEthChainID' -A 10 # Check test cases related to GetEthChainID in appconst/appconst_test.go rg --type go 'GetEthChainID' app/appconst/appconst_test.go -A 5Length of output: 1451
144-144: Switch toNewEthPrivAccfor address generation.The change from
evmtest.NewEthAccInfo().NibiruAddr.String()toevmtest.NewEthPrivAcc().NibiruAddr.String()indicates a shift in the test setup. Ensure thatNewEthPrivAccprovides the intended account characteristics.Verification successful
Verified:
NewEthPrivAccprovides the intended account characteristics.The function
NewEthPrivAcccorrectly sets up the account by generating a private key, deriving both Ethereum and Nibiru addresses, and preparing the necessary signer. This change in the test setup is appropriate and aligns with the intended use.
- Function Location:
x/evm/evmtest/eth.golines 27-37Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify `NewEthPrivAcc` provides the intended account characteristics. # Test: Search for `NewEthPrivAcc` implementation. Expect: Correct account setup. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func NewEthPrivAcc() $_ { $$$ }'Length of output: 664
eth/rpc/backend/account_info_test.go (2)
84-84: EnsureNewEthPrivAccmeets test requirements.The change to
evmtest.NewEthPrivAcc().EthAddrin these test cases indicates a consistent shift in the account type used. Verify thatNewEthPrivAccis suitable for all these scenarios, maintaining test validity.Also applies to: 202-202, 211-211, 223-223, 263-263, 272-272, 283-283, 297-297, 311-311, 325-325, 396-396
36-36: Switch toNewEthPrivAccfor test accounts.The switch to
evmtest.NewEthPrivAcc().EthAddracross multiple test cases suggests a change in the type of Ethereum account being tested. Ensure that this change reflects the intended test scenarios and thatNewEthPrivAccprovides the necessary account features.Also applies to: 44-44, 55-55
Verification successful
Switch to
NewEthPrivAccis appropriate for test accounts.The
NewEthPrivAccfunction provides a comprehensive setup for Ethereum accounts, including the private key, Ethereum address, and Nibiru address. This makes it suitable for test scenarios requiring detailed account features. The switch appears to be justified and aligns with the intended test requirements.
NewEthPrivAccgenerates a private key and derives the Ethereum and Nibiru addresses, ensuring all necessary account features are available for testing.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify `NewEthPrivAcc` provides the necessary account features for tests. # Test: Search for `NewEthPrivAcc` implementation. Expect: Correct account setup. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func NewEthPrivAcc() $_ { $$$ }'Length of output: 664
eth/rpc/backend/evm_query_client_test.go (1)
251-251: Switch toNewEthPrivAccfor validator address.The change to
evmtest.NewEthPrivAcc().EthAddr.Bytes()for the validator address suggests a shift in the account characteristics being tested. Ensure thatNewEthPrivAccprovides the appropriate setup for validator accounts.eth/rpc/backend/call_tx_test.go (2)
390-390: Verify the impact of using a private account address.The change to
evmtest.NewEthPrivAcc().EthAddrcould affect the test behavior if private accounts have different properties. Ensure that this change aligns with the test's intended logic.
25-25: Verify the impact of using a private account address.The change to
evmtest.NewEthPrivAcc().EthAddrcould affect the test behavior if private accounts have different properties. Ensure that this change aligns with the test's intended logic.Verification successful
Verified: The use of
evmtest.NewEthPrivAcc().EthAddris consistent across the codebase.The
NewEthPrivAccfunction is widely used in various test files, indicating it is a standard utility for generating test Ethereum addresses. This change aligns with its intended purpose and should not disrupt the test logic.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `evmtest.NewEthPrivAcc().EthAddr` across the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of `NewEthPrivAcc` to understand its impact. rg --type go 'NewEthPrivAcc'Length of output: 5869
x/evm/tx_test.go (1)
48-48: Verify the impact of using a private account address.The change to
evmtest.NewEthPrivAcc().EthAddrcould affect the test behavior if private accounts have different properties. Ensure that this change aligns with the test's intended logic.x/evm/keeper/erc20_test.go (4)
28-29: LGTM! Improved contract address computation and assertions.The changes streamline the computation of the expected ERC20 address and update assertions to ensure correctness. This enhances readability and reliability.
Also applies to: 32-44, 51-64
155-157: LGTM! Improved contract address computation and assertions.The changes streamline the computation of the expected ERC20 address and update assertions to ensure correctness. This enhances readability and reliability.
Also applies to: 178-187
322-322: LGTM! Consistent context management.Wrapping the context with
sdk.WrapSDKContextensures consistent context management across tests, improving reliability.
233-233: LGTM! Improved contract address computation and assertions.The changes streamline the computation of the expected ERC20 address and update assertions to ensure correctness. This enhances readability and reliability.
Also applies to: 255-255
x/evm/msg_test.go (2)
961-961: Consistent use ofevmtest.NewEthPrivAcc()inTestTransactionLogsEncodeDecode.This update aligns with the broader refactor to use private accounts. It should ensure that the test accurately reflects the handling of private keys and associated data.
48-53: Use ofevmtest.NewEthPrivAcc()for account initialization.The change from
evmtest.NewEthAccInfo()toevmtest.NewEthPrivAcc()suggests a shift to using private account structures, likely for enhanced security or more precise testing of private key functionalities. Ensure that all tests are still valid with this change.Verification successful
Consistent Use of
evmtest.NewEthPrivAcc()Across TestsThe function
evmtest.NewEthPrivAcc()is used consistently across various test files, ensuring that the tests remain valid with the shift to using private account structures. This consistency supports the reliability of the tests concerning private key functionalities.
- Instances found in files such as
x/evm/tx_test.go,x/evm/logs_test.go,x/evm/keeper/grpc_query_test.go, and many others.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `evmtest.NewEthPrivAcc()` in test files. # Test: Check if the function is used consistently across the test suite. rg --type go 'evmtest\.NewEthPrivAcc\(\)'Length of output: 5297
x/evm/keeper/grpc_query_test.go (7)
143-143: Use ofevmtest.NewEthPrivAcc()for non-existing account query.The change to
evmtest.NewEthPrivAcc()ensures that the test case for querying a non-existing account uses a private account structure. This aligns with the overall refactor for consistency.
307-307: Use ofevmtest.NewEthPrivAcc()inTestQueryStorage.The update to use
evmtest.NewEthPrivAcc()ensures that storage queries are tested with private account structures, enhancing test accuracy for scenarios involving private keys.
330-330: Use ofevmtest.NewEthPrivAcc()inTestQueryStoragefor uncommitted state.This change ensures that tests for uncommitted states also utilize private account structures, maintaining consistency across test scenarios.
383-383: Use ofevmtest.NewEthPrivAcc()inTestQueryCode.The change to use
evmtest.NewEthPrivAcc()for querying code ensures that the test accurately reflects scenarios involving private accounts, aligning with the refactor's objectives.
432-432: Update to context handling withsdk.WrapSDKContext.The change from
deps.GoCtx()tosdk.WrapSDKContext(deps.Ctx)ensures proper context wrapping for SDK interactions, which is crucial for accurate request processing within the EVM keeper.Also applies to: 443-443
527-527: Use ofevmtest.NewEthPrivAcc()inTestQueryBalance.The update to use
evmtest.NewEthPrivAcc()for balance queries ensures that tests involving balance checks are consistent with the private account structure refactor.
669-669: Use ofevmtest.NewEthPrivAcc()inTestEstimateGasForEvmCallType.The consistent use of
evmtest.NewEthPrivAcc()for estimating gas in EVM call types ensures that these tests reflect scenarios involving private accounts, supporting the refactor's goals.Also applies to: 676-676, 703-703
eth/rpc/backend/blocks_test.go (3)
252-252: Verify the use ofNewEthPrivAccforvalidator.Ensure that the change from
NewEthAccInfotoNewEthPrivAccfor thevalidatorfield aligns with the intended test behavior and doesn't inadvertently affect the test logic.Also applies to: 267-267, 282-282, 300-300, 323-323
929-929: Verify the use ofNewEthPrivAccforvalidator.Ensure that the change from
NewEthAccInfotoNewEthPrivAccfor thevalidatorfield aligns with the intended test behavior and doesn't inadvertently affect the test logic.Also applies to: 977-977, 1001-1001, 1031-1031, 1055-1055
107-107: Verify the use ofNewEthPrivAccforvalidator.The change from
NewEthAccInfotoNewEthPrivAccfor thevalidatorfield implies a shift from a public to a private account. Ensure this change aligns with the intended test behavior and that it doesn't inadvertently affect the test logic.Also applies to: 123-123, 139-139, 156-156, 178-178
Verification successful
Verified: Consistent use of
NewEthPrivAccforvalidatoracross tests.The change to use
NewEthPrivAccfor thevalidatorfield is consistent with its usage in other test files. This suggests that the change aligns with the intended test behavior and does not negatively impact the test logic.
- The use of
NewEthPrivAccis consistent across multiple test files.- The change is in line with the testing strategy observed in the codebase.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `NewEthPrivAcc` in the codebase. # Test: Search for `NewEthPrivAcc` usage. Expect: Consistent usage across relevant test cases. rg --type go 'NewEthPrivAcc'Length of output: 5869
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- x/evm/evmtest/smart_contract.go (2 hunks)
- x/evm/evmtest/smart_contract_test.go (3 hunks)
- x/evm/evmtest/tx.go (8 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/msg_ethereum_tx_test.go (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- x/evm/evmtest/smart_contract_test.go
- x/evm/keeper/msg_ethereum_tx_test.go
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
x/evm/evmtest/smart_contract.go
[warning] 58-58: x/evm/evmtest/smart_contract.go#L58
Added line #L58 was not covered by tests
[warning] 82-82: x/evm/evmtest/smart_contract.go#L82
Added line #L82 was not covered by testsx/evm/evmtest/tx.go
[warning] 117-117: x/evm/evmtest/tx.go#L117
Added line #L117 was not covered by tests
[warning] 127-127: x/evm/evmtest/tx.go#L127
Added line #L127 was not covered by tests
[warning] 164-164: x/evm/evmtest/tx.go#L164
Added line #L164 was not covered by tests
[warning] 198-198: x/evm/evmtest/tx.go#L198
Added line #L198 was not covered by tests
[warning] 211-211: x/evm/evmtest/tx.go#L211
Added line #L211 was not covered by tests
[warning] 226-234: x/evm/evmtest/tx.go#L226-L234
Added lines #L226 - L234 were not covered by tests
[warning] 240-242: x/evm/evmtest/tx.go#L240-L242
Added lines #L240 - L242 were not covered by tests
[warning] 267-267: x/evm/evmtest/tx.go#L267
Added line #L267 was not covered by tests
Additional comments not posted (7)
x/evm/evmtest/smart_contract.go (2)
40-63: LGTM! Verify function usage due to renaming.The function
CreateContractTxMsghas been renamed toCreateContractMsgEthereumTx, and the method for obtaining the Ethereum signer has been updated togethcore.LatestSignerForChainID. These changes enhance clarity and maintainability. Ensure that all references to the renamed function are updated throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Function usage updated successfully.
The function
CreateContractMsgEthereumTxis correctly used in the codebase, with all references matching the new signature. No outdated references were found.
- Verified in
x/evm/keeper/msg_ethereum_tx_test.go- Verified in
x/evm/evmtest/smart_contract_test.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `CreateContractMsgEthereumTx` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type go -A 5 $'CreateContractMsgEthereumTx'Length of output: 1855
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 58-58: x/evm/evmtest/smart_contract.go#L58
Added line #L58 was not covered by tests
66-87: LGTM! Verify function usage due to renaming.The function
ExecuteContractTxMsghas been renamed toExecuteContractMsgEthereumTx, and the method for obtaining the Ethereum signer has been updated togethcore.LatestSignerForChainID. These changes enhance clarity and maintainability. Ensure that all references to the renamed function are updated throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Function renaming verified successfully.
The function
ExecuteContractMsgEthereumTxis correctly used in the test filesmsg_ethereum_tx_test.goandsmart_contract_test.go. All references to the renamed function have been updated appropriately. No further action is needed.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `ExecuteContractMsgEthereumTx` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type go -A 5 $'ExecuteContractMsgEthereumTx'Length of output: 1234
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 82-82: x/evm/evmtest/smart_contract.go#L82
Added line #L82 was not covered by testsx/evm/evmtest/tx.go (5)
Line range hint
117-127:
Verify recipient address logic and context management.The recipient address logic has been updated to use
NewEthPrivAcc().EthAddr, and the context management now usessdk.WrapSDKContext(deps.Ctx). Ensure these changes are correct and consider adding test coverage for these lines.Would you like assistance in updating or adding tests for these changes?
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 117-117: x/evm/evmtest/tx.go#L117
Added line #L117 was not covered by tests
Line range hint
198-211:
Verify recipient address logic and context management.The recipient address logic has been updated to use
NewEthPrivAcc().EthAddr, and the context management now usessdk.WrapSDKContext(deps.Ctx). Ensure these changes are correct and consider adding test coverage for these lines.Would you like assistance in updating or adding tests for these changes?
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 198-198: x/evm/evmtest/tx.go#L198
Added line #L198 was not covered by tests
164-164: Verify context management.The context management now uses
sdk.WrapSDKContext(deps.Ctx). Ensure this change is correct and consider adding test coverage for this line.Would you like assistance in updating or adding tests for this change?
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 164-164: x/evm/evmtest/tx.go#L164
Added line #L164 was not covered by tests
226-242: Verify signer retrieval and context management.The method for obtaining the Geth signer has been updated to
gethcore.LatestSignerForChainID, and context management now usessdk.WrapSDKContext(deps.Ctx). Ensure these changes are correct and consider adding test coverage for these lines.Would you like assistance in updating or adding tests for these changes?
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 226-234: x/evm/evmtest/tx.go#L226-L234
Added lines #L226 - L234 were not covered by tests
[warning] 240-242: x/evm/evmtest/tx.go#L240-L242
Added lines #L240 - L242 were not covered by tests
267-267: Verify context management.The context management now uses
sdk.WrapSDKContext(deps.Ctx). Ensure this change is correct and consider adding test coverage for this line.Would you like assistance in updating or adding tests for this change?
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 267-267: x/evm/evmtest/tx.go#L267
Added line #L267 was not covered by tests
Purpose / Abstract
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
CHANGELOG.mdto reflect recent modifications and maintain transparency on ongoing improvements.Refactor
Tests