Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

python310Packages.cryptography: don't depend on pytest-benchmark #228439

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 28, 2023

Conversation

dotlambda
Copy link
Member

Description of changes
Things done
  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 23.05 Release Notes (or backporting 22.11 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@dotlambda dotlambda force-pushed the pytest-benchmark-test branch from 3f8c7a2 to c6355a7 Compare April 27, 2023 17:55
@dotlambda
Copy link
Member Author

FYI Cryptography's benchmarks also weren't run before this change.

@ofborg ofborg bot requested a review from SuperSandro2000 April 27, 2023 18:13
@SuperSandro2000 SuperSandro2000 merged commit 6f72e87 into NixOS:staging Apr 28, 2023
@dotlambda dotlambda deleted the pytest-benchmark-test branch April 28, 2023 14:39
@vcunat
Copy link
Member

vcunat commented May 5, 2023

@SuperSandro2000
Copy link
Member

I am going to create a PR which disables those tests ionelmc/pytest-benchmark#231

@SuperSandro2000
Copy link
Member

#230170

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants