Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fuzz protodetect sip 7435 v1 #12232

Closed

Conversation

catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor

Link to ticket: https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/
https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/7435
https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/7436

Describe changes:

  • fuzz : fix target fuzz_applayerprotodetectgetproto with right init sequence
  • fix bug found with it : SIP cannot use UPDATE (over TCP) as protocol detection pattern as HTTP/1 already uses it

Part of #12163

As too many cases are found when splitting tcp payload
As it is also used for HTTP/1
Remove it only for TCP and keep it for UDP.

Ticket: 7436
@victorjulien victorjulien added this to the 8.0 milestone Dec 5, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 5, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.19%. Comparing base (09ba69c) to head (ebbdf2f).
Report is 9 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #12232   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   83.19%   83.19%           
=======================================
  Files         912      912           
  Lines      257166   257173    +7     
=======================================
+ Hits       213938   213946    +8     
+ Misses      43228    43227    -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
fuzzcorpus 61.01% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
livemode 19.41% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
pcap 44.38% <100.00%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
suricata-verify 62.76% <100.00%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
unittests 59.19% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@suricata-qa
Copy link

Information: QA ran without warnings.

Pipeline 23710

@victorjulien
Copy link
Member

Merged in #12245, thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants